This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
@Alpha Beta
–
For Cardano's method, I'd suggest just reading up on it. It's a bunch of algebra stating how to solve the depressed cubic (no quadratic term).
There is also a general formula for the cubic (and quartic) equation, but I can honestly say that I never bothered to memorize what they are.
[LaTex edited in by peter...not sure if I preserved Tim's order's of operations correctly (lots of parentheses), so see his top section for official version]
I don't mean to be intrusive, but I edited in a LaTex attempt of your answer so that people can read it easier. If that is not what you meant, feel free to re-edit it, using my LaTex and the formatting guide for help.
There is a link to the formatting guide at the base of the window where you enter a comment. Please put all math in LaTex as it is way easier to read than teasing out terms bounded by parentheses within parentheses. LaTex is actually easier, or just as hard as typing math the ugly way, but it is still easy to bungle. Please use the edit post button and the preview function, until your math states what you mean. Cheers:)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
hmmm,,, i'd leave the question if i were you
anyways, you can see solutions here
Click on exact form (its dirty)
i want full solution please/........
how do u get this.......
Log in to reply
What of the following techniques do you know how to use to factorize a polynomial?
Log in to reply
Please Calvin,can you teach me CARDANO'S METHOD...........PLEASEEEEEE
Log in to reply
There is also a general formula for the cubic (and quartic) equation, but I can honestly say that I never bothered to memorize what they are.
1,2,3,4,5
You can use rational root theorem to know if there is a rational root, or you can cyclic factorize it.
Log in to reply
However, there is no rational root
You must know the product of the roots and the sum of the roots, you can also use that
x = -1/6 (1-i sqrt(3)) (27/2-(3 sqrt(69))/2)^(1/3)-((1+i sqrt(3)) (1/2 (9+sqrt(69)))^(1/3))/(2 3^(2/3))
x=6−1(1−i3)(2227−(369)31−(1+i3)(2332)21(9+69)31
[LaTex edited in by peter...not sure if I preserved Tim's order's of operations correctly (lots of parentheses), so see his top section for official version]
Log in to reply
Hey Tim,
I don't mean to be intrusive, but I edited in a LaTex attempt of your answer so that people can read it easier. If that is not what you meant, feel free to re-edit it, using my LaTex and the formatting guide for help.
There is a link to the formatting guide at the base of the window where you enter a comment. Please put all math in LaTex as it is way easier to read than teasing out terms bounded by parentheses within parentheses. LaTex is actually easier, or just as hard as typing math the ugly way, but it is still easy to bungle. Please use the edit post button and the preview function, until your math states what you mean. Cheers:)