I was reading this proof of 2001 IMO Problem #2, proving for \(a,b,c\in\mathbb{R}^+\) that \(\sum \frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+8bc}}\ge1\). In a proof using Jensen's inequality, it says
This inequality is homogeneous so we can assume without loss of generality .
I've read multiple proofs saying we can assume whatever because the terms are homogeneous, but what can you assume without loss of generality from homogeneity?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
In this post I consider only inequalities in three variables, but it extends to any number of variables. Expression f(a,b,c) is said to be homogeneous of degree k if and only if there exists real k such that for every t>0 we have tk⋅f(a,b,c)=f(ta,tb,tc) For instance in your example we have f(a,b,c)=cyc∑a2+8bca−1 and this expression f is homogeneous of degree 0, i.e. f(a,b,c)=f(ta,tb,tc)
Okay, now finally why can the assumption a+b+c=1 be made? Assume that a+b+c=m for m>0 i.e. ma+mb+mc=1 Let a′=ma, b′=mb, c′=mc. Then a′+b′+c′=1 But the homegeneity of degree 0 tells us that f(a′,b′,c′)=f(ma+mb+mc)=f(a,b,c) (in case it's not clear, we used m1=t, remember that t can be arbitrary positive real number). Hence proving f(a′,b′,c′)≥0 is equivalent to proving f(a,b,c)≥0 and we have the nice condition that a′+b′+c′=1
You can assume many other things (but only one assumption at a time), like a=1 b=1 c=1 abc=1 ab+bc+ca=1 a2+b2+c2=1 etc. also the number on right-hand side of these assumptions doesn't need to be 1.
Log in to reply
Do you have any other good examples of how homogeneity is useful?
Log in to reply
In general, homogeneous inequalities are easier to work with, that's because most known inequalities (AM-GM, Cauchy-Schwarz, etc.) are themselves homogeneous, so they are easier to apply to homogeneous inequalities, that's not to say that you can't prove non-homogeneous inequalities with them, but it's just usually easier to prove homogeneous inequalities.
Another reason is that many techniques rely on homogeneity such as SHED or [PDF] sum of squares
EDIT: Deleted example because it was wrong. (I am too tired.)
i got the above example but can u pls explain how it can be used in inequality like:
a^2/(a+1) + b^2/(b+1) >= 1/3, where a+b=1;
(i am getting K as 1, which is possible wrong)
Log in to reply
In this case you must homogenize (make it homogeneous) by taking a+1a2=(a+b)(2a+b)a2 and similar (hint: to finish, use Titus lemma)
Log in to reply
i got K=1, but since this inequality is equivalent to : a^3 + b^3 >= ((a^2)b) + ((b^2)a), this gives K=3.
thank you in advance
Thank you so much!
What should I assume, if the given inequality is homogenous equation of degree one? @Jan J.
But how can we assume a=1?!
A symmetric equation can be assumed true.
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=386799&p=2148037#p2148037 in here