Suppose one chooses any of the following types of intervals
\([a,b]\),
,
in where and can be very arbitrarily close to each other but not equal to each other. Can one always find two irrationals and within any chosen domain such that or is rational?
As an example, let us consider the interval , one can find the two irrationals and within this interval that give a difference of which is rational. Also one can find the irrationals and whose sum gives , a rational again.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
For any interval (a,b) of length (b−a) matters where so it is convenient to take a,b>0 . Now choose a rational c such that a<c<b we want to find another d∈(a,b) such that both of c+d and c−d belong to (a,b). It's clear that by adding a d with c won't make c+d>b which happens only if d<b−c ,similarly for c−d>a we must have d<c−a . It is sufficient to find an d satisfying d<min{b−c,c−a}=2∣b−a∣−∣b+a−2c∣ so that there are two irrationals c±d which add upto a rational. SImilar reasoning for d produces a lower bound for d such that we can find a d satisfying 2∣a−b∣+∣a+b−2c∣<d<2∣b−a∣−∣b+a−2c∣. Even by choosing c such that 2a<c<2b it can be achieved that the sum of the two irrationals also will lie in (a,b) that is a<(c+d)+(c−d)<b.