This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I think that the expression does not converge at all. To show that, we will proof
n1+n21+n4...>nk
for all natural numbers n and k. Here is the proof by induction on k:
START: k = 1
The values of all square roots in the expression are greater than 1, so we have:
n1+...>n=n1
STEP from k to k +1:
We assume n1+n21+n4...>2k for all n and a particular k.
This also applies to n2, so we have:
n21+n4...>(n2)k=n2k
We conclude:
n1+n21+n4...>n1+n2k>nn2k=n×nk=nk+1
The start of induction and the step of induction show the assumption for all k.
We can apply this statement for n=2:
21+41+16...>2k
This will exceed any real number for large k and does not converge. Therefore, the whole expression does not converge, the value of x is undefined.
Thanks a lot @Finnley Paolella! Just asking of curiosity, do you know of any expressions like this(I mean continuing infinitely0), which look like they won't converge, but they do?
Vinayak asked for the second expression - which diverges. The first expression is also very interesting, I haven't found the solution to that yet, just estimated the result to be around 4.14031456214126 using python (look at the comments under my solution). If you find the exact result for the first expression, please let me know!
Since sqrt of 3, 5, 17, 257, 65537 ......are not defined(So it means they are undefined), so the sum is not a rational number, it is an irrational number. Not an imaginary number, a complex number.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I think that the expression does not converge at all. To show that, we will proof n1+n21+n4...>nk for all natural numbers n and k. Here is the proof by induction on k:
START: k = 1 The values of all square roots in the expression are greater than 1, so we have: n1+...>n=n1
STEP from k to k +1:
We assume n1+n21+n4...>2k for all n and a particular k.
This also applies to n2, so we have: n21+n4...>(n2)k=n2k
We conclude: n1+n21+n4...>n1+n2k>nn2k=n×nk=nk+1
The start of induction and the step of induction show the assumption for all k.
We can apply this statement for n=2:
21+41+16...>2k
This will exceed any real number for large k and does not converge. Therefore, the whole expression does not converge, the value of x is undefined.
Log in to reply
Thanks a lot @Finnley Paolella! Just asking of curiosity, do you know of any expressions like this(I mean continuing infinitely0), which look like they won't converge, but they do?
Log in to reply
I think the expression 1+21+41+81+161+… converges.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@David Vreken, @Mahdi Raza, @Finnley Paolella
1+21+41+81+16⋯ or 1+21+41+161+256⋯?
Log in to reply
Vinayak asked for the second expression - which diverges. The first expression is also very interesting, I haven't found the solution to that yet, just estimated the result to be around 4.14031456214126 using python (look at the comments under my solution). If you find the exact result for the first expression, please let me know!
Log in to reply
Ok. So I will start with the first.
Since sqrt of 3, 5, 17, 257, 65537 ......are not defined(So it means they are undefined), so the sum is not a rational number, it is an irrational number. Not an imaginary number, a complex number.