This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
@Mahdi Raza
–
I believe it actually may. James mentioned that the rational numbers (fractions) are "countably" or "listably" infinite. So we could, with an infinite amount of time, write them all down. However, the irrational numbers are "uncountably" or "unlistably" infinite, which means that even with an infinite amount of time, there would still be more numbers we had missed. So in a very odd sense, there would be more irrational numbers than rational. Though it seems much more intuitive to simply have one kind/size of infinity, since you can't have more than everything. :) @Zakir Husain
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I think irrational? I am not sure...
I think there will be an infinite number of rationals and irrationals
Log in to reply
Infinities are also comparable, we have to see which infinity is bigger see here
Log in to reply
Nice video. Though I still don't know the answer to what is bigger in this case (rational or irrational)
Log in to reply
@Zakir Husain
I believe it actually may. James mentioned that the rational numbers (fractions) are "countably" or "listably" infinite. So we could, with an infinite amount of time, write them all down. However, the irrational numbers are "uncountably" or "unlistably" infinite, which means that even with an infinite amount of time, there would still be more numbers we had missed. So in a very odd sense, there would be more irrational numbers than rational. Though it seems much more intuitive to simply have one kind/size of infinity, since you can't have more than everything. :)@Zakir Husain: Check this out
Log in to reply
@Mahdi Raza thanks!