How to predict Pythagorian Triplet if only the smallest side is given?

We all know that Pythagorian Triplet must be a whole number and must be a2+b2=c\sqrt{a^2 + b^2} = c . Below is a list of some Pythagorian Triplet ( aa is the smallest leg and cc is the largest leg or the hypotenuse)...

aabbcc
345
94041
6810
153639

But did you know that you can predict Pythagorian Triplet using only the smallest leg? But before that, we must identify what is SIMPLE TRIPLET and PRODUCT TRIPLET. What are those? Simple triplet is a Pythagorean Triplet whose values are not multiplied with any number while Product Triplet is a Pythagorean Triplet whose values are products of values of a simple triplet and a number.

From the above example, the Simple Triplets there are 3, 4, 5 and 9, 40, and 41 while the Product Triplet are 6, 8, 10 and 15, 36, 39. Why? You cannot lower the terms if Simple Triplet (like 3, 4, 5) is in ratio (3:4:5) while in Product Triplet, you can. You can lower 6:8:10 into 3:4:5 and 15:36:39 into 5:12:13.

Another way of identifying SimpleTriplet and Product Triplet is subtracting the larger leg from the hypotenuse (cbc - b). If cb=1c - b = 1, then it is a Simple Triplet. If cb>1c - b > 1, then it is a Product Triplet. (Note: the value of cbc - b of a Product Triplet is the number to be divided from the triplet to get the Simple Triplet)

Example: From first triplet (3, 4, 5) cb=?c - b = ? 54=15 - 4 = 1 cb=1c - b = 1, then it is a Simple Triplet

From fourth example (15, 36, 39) cb=?c - b = ? 3936=339 - 36 = 3 cb>1c - b > 1, then it is a Product Triplet

In which Simple Triplet it was based? (Note: apa_p is aa of Product Triplet while asa_s is aa of the Simple Triplet. Same as bb and cc)

For the value of asa_s ap=(as)(cb)a_p = (a_s)(c - b) 15=(as)(3)15 = (a_s)(3) 153=(as)(3)3\frac{15}{3} = \frac {(a_s)(3)}{3} as=5a_s = 5

For the value of bsb_s bp=(bs)(cb)b_p = (b_s)(c - b) 36=(bs)(3)36 = (b_s)(3) 363=(bs)(3)3\frac{36}{3} = \frac {(b_s)(3)}{3} bs=12b_s = 12

For the value of csc_s cp=(cs)(cb)c_p = (c_s)(c - b) 39=(cs)(3)39 = (c_s)(3) 393=(cs)(3)3\frac{39}{3} = \frac {(c_s)(3)}{3} cs=13c_s = 13

It was based from the Simple Triplet 5,12,5, 12, and 1313

Now, how could you identify using only the smallest leg (aa)given? By using the formula b=a212b = \frac {a^2 - 1}{2} and c=a212+1c = \frac {a^2 - 1}{2} + 1 or simply c=b+1c = b + 1, you can now get the Simple Triplet.

For example: If a=3a = 3, what is bb and cc?

Using the formula for bb, b=a212b = \frac {a^2 - 1}{2} b=(3)212b = \frac {(3)^2 - 1}{2} b=912b = \frac {9 - 1}{2} b=82b = \frac {8}{2} b=4b = 4

and formula for cc c=b+1c = b + 1 c=4+1c = 4 + 1 c=5c = 5

The values for bb and cc are 44 and 55, respectively.

Other example:

  1. If a=7a = 7, what is bb and cc?

Using the formula for bb, b=a212b = \frac {a^2 - 1}{2} b=(7)212b = \frac {(7)^2 - 1}{2} b=4912b = \frac {49 - 1}{2} b=482b = \frac {48}{2} b=24b = 24

and formula for cc c=b+1c = b + 1 c=24+1c = 24 + 1 c=25c = 25

Let's check using Pythagorian Theorem: c=a2+b2c = \sqrt {a^2 + b^2} 25=(7)2+(24)225 = \sqrt {(7)^2 + (24)^2} 25=49+57625 = \sqrt {49 + 576} 25=62525 = \sqrt {625} 25=25\boxed{25 = 25}

Limitations for these formulas:

  1. It can be applicable if the value of aa is odd.

  2. It can be applicable if the value of aa is a whole number.

(Honestly, I just discovered these formulas without reading. I hope it works)

#Algebra

Note by Jade Mijares
6 years, 3 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Consider a=65.a = 65. By your formulae, b=2112, c=2113.b = 2112,\ c = 2113. If you check the numbers, it turns out that yes, they work. So the formulae are useful, at least for coming up with triples. But what if I told you there is a significantly smaller simple triple for a=65?a = 65? b=72, c=97.b = 72,\ c = 97. So you can't actually predict a pythagorean triple given only the smallest leg, you can just find one simple solution in particular.

Caleb Townsend - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

To clarify, there are not only additional product triplets that can be found, but often additional simple triplets as well, that do not obey the formulae.

Caleb Townsend - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I understand now.... Thank you!!!

Jade Mijares - 5 years, 6 months ago

You can predict, but not all triples...

Jade Mijares - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

That is precisely the point; you can find a pythagorean triple with those formulae, but if I told you to guess the triple I'm thinking of given the smallest side length, you won't necessarily guess my triple.

Caleb Townsend - 6 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Caleb Townsend I'm not a mind reader to guess. Many formulas have their own limitations. I know only few is applicable in these formulas. If you tend to prove that I am wrong, then I can say that the triples you are showing are out of my topic.

Jade Mijares - 6 years, 3 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...