Hi Brilliant folks,
I made a website http://math-utilities.com/, for the sake of this community. Feel free to head over to that page, and make use of it.
I love this problem solvers community and felt its my bit to help others along their journey.
Thanks a lot! Any cheers and blessings are much appreciated.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Nice Code.Well Done!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Log in to reply
Thank you. Thumbs up :)
Neat website!
Why do you think that this function does not always work?
What if there are multiple real roots between the "Start" and "End"?
Log in to reply
The remainder finding algorithm fails in certain cases. I am not yet sure if it is closer to 100% but I have improved it to cut down some border cases. The polynomial eq. solver gives all real roots between Start and End. Thanks a lot for the neat comment! Looking forward for more positive feedback.
Log in to reply
Your "bisection method" section might be flawed.
I've submitted
1,3,3,1
for the coefficients, and the range between -10 and 10.The answer spits out -1.007937, but it should be just -1 (with a multiplicity of 3).
Plus, you might want to add a function to find the multiplicity of the roots.
Your "Cubic equation solver" might be flawed as well.
I've submitted
1,3,3,1
for the coefficients as well, and it outputs: NaN for all x1, x2, x3.Your GCD and LCM are flawed too.
If I submit "-2, -4" in GCD, it should spit out 2, not -2.
If I submit "-2, -1, -3" in LCM, it should spit out 6, not -6.
Log in to reply
@Siva Bathula Good work!
Thanks for it.
Nice website!
Good website
Log in to reply
Will you please send me ur email address. I have to send you some solutions.
How to find last three digits of 7^999 without using Euler's function or by using it also. Will it be true for all primes like 13^999 or any other. Please let me know it. And about this website, it is a good one.
Log in to reply
Great!
How to get PDF of functional equations book by BJ Venkatachala
Log in to reply
It's pdf is not available