If given f(c)=L,
(a) should limx→cf(x) exist?
(b) If the limit is exist, should limx→cf(x)=L?
Prove your answer!
PS:
I don't know how can I prove it. But I know that limx→cf(x)=L exist if and only if limx→c+f(x)=L and limx→c−f(x)=L. Hence (b) is not true. But then my teacher said that was an incomplete solution. Can anyone help?
#Calculus
#Limits
#Physics
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
(a) The function being defined at c does not mean that the limit is defined at c. For example, given the piecewise function
f(x)=x1(x<0) f(x)=5−x(x=0) f(x)=sin(x1)(x>0)
At 0, f is defined (it equals 5), but the limit does not exist at 0 because the left and right sided limits are unequal (and don't exist).
(b) No. Again, with a piecewise function
f(x)=xx2(x<0) f(x)=x+3(x=0) f(x)=x2(x>0)
The limit of this function at 0 is in fact 0 since the left sided limit is 0 as well as the right sided limit. However, when this function is defined at 0, it is not 0, in fact, it is 3.
Accompanying graph: https://i.imgur.com/2Gh4qJF.png
The enclosed red circle indicates f(0), i.e., what the function is when evaluated at 0. However, the empty red circle indicates the limit at 0, i.e., the mutual value that the functions to the left and right side of it are approaching.
Log in to reply
Another example (if you want) of a function like above is: f(x)={21x=0x=0
Even though limx→0f(x)=1, f(0) is 2.
Hmmm I pose a question though. In the original question, the function didn't have to be continuous, but what if it did? If the function is continuous, would the statements above always be true? Would the limx→cf(x)=L mean that f(c)=L for continuous functions?
Log in to reply
I believe that's actually one of the definitions of a continuous function. I'm a bit rusty on that though.
Log in to reply
f(x) is continuous iff limx→cf(x)=f(c) for all c (in the domain of f.)
Yep, a functionWow, thanks for your quick answer Michael T. I answer the same, saying both questions with no. But I wonder, are there any proof without giving counterexample?
To know the basics of limits, i suggest u to join a free online course of calculus one on coursera.org
Then limit must be continuous for limx→cf(x)=L.