Therefore,1+r2(θ′)2r3θ′=f,f is another constant.
Now,this is valid for all r,θ,
Therefore,initial conditions will also satisfy.
initially,ray is horizontal.
Therefore,dxdy=0
Therefore,θ′=rtanθ
substituting,for initial conditions,
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I have written the final answer.It's just that it came in one of our exams and none of the faculty was able to solve it.Also when I tried I wasn't able to solve using elementary techniques.It requires to minimize the value of an integral,the technique for which I learned from calculus of variations.
I think that it should be R/sin(x)=r/sin(X).Also,we cannot use X directly since it is not the angle of incidence,it changes as the angle with normal of the circle changes.
@Akshay Bodhare
–
Because if the rays velocity has a component paralell to radius inward, it will move further inward, it stops moving inward, when it becomes perpendicular to radius vector, (just like an alpha particle thrown at a gold nucleus not along the radial line )
@Akshay Bodhare
–
that is not at all a problem, for two reasons, one is that my theta is not the polar angle as yours, mine is the angle the ray makes with the local radial line which also happens to be the normal which was not 0 initially,
secondly, that is not the actual angle at r=R , because i only care about the angles inside the glass ball, not outside,,
thirdly, if the ray was along the radius initially, then too my equations would hold , you may check it,, infact in ur equations i believe you have taken theta as polar angle, please see, this problem should obviously have radial symmetry , and hence the result can never explicitly depend on theta because then it would mean that it actually matters what axes you choose to define the system,,,
NOTE it, my theta is not the polar angle, it is the local angle of incidence
@Mvs Saketh
–
let us assume that the ray never bended,then it went in a straight line,if it goes in a straight line then minimum distance = rsinθ.Please think.
@Mvs Saketh
–
I chose the axis like that to reduce the calculations.Also,please consider the thought i gave,the minimum distance should be greater than rsinθ
@Mvs Saketh
–
I was trying the problem again using snell's law,you should also take into consideration the fact that the normal is changing continuously,thus the angle will not be θ+dθ it will be θ+dθ+dα
Yes, I am from FIITJEE Kochi. And I couldn't solve it during the test...
I did solve it when I got home though. And yea, our faculty also couldn't solve it.
Btw, how is AITS going for you?
@Akshay Bodhare
–
My mains rank is always better than my advanced rank. For PT-2 I think I got a rank of 63 in Mains and 183 in Advanced. What about you?
@Akshay Bodhare
–
I'm hoping for something within the first 1000. But, you never know huh? Oh, and it's really cool that you know about the Calculus of variations and the Lagrangian...I only came to know about it when I tried solving the brachistochrone problem.
@Akshay Bodhare
–
Great :D ...Well, good luck for the boards(I have my board practicals starting on the day after tomorrow). Was a pleasure corresponding with you :)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Interesting Problem ! what is final answer ? @Akshay Bodhare
May be it can help Click here
Log in to reply
I have written the final answer.It's just that it came in one of our exams and none of the faculty was able to solve it.Also when I tried I wasn't able to solve using elementary techniques.It requires to minimize the value of an integral,the technique for which I learned from calculus of variations.
i am getting R/ sin(X) = r/ sin(x)
can you please show your process,
Log in to reply
I have updated the note.
I think that it should be R/sin(x)=r/sin(X).Also,we cannot use X directly since it is not the angle of incidence,it changes as the angle with normal of the circle changes.
Log in to reply
i didnt use the lagrangian way, instead i took a small concentric slab, and used snells law
sin(θ)sin(θ+dθ)=krk(r−dr)
≃1+cot(θ)dθ=1−rdr=>cot(θ)dθ=−dr/rorln(sin(θo)sin(θ))=−ln(Rr)orRsin(θ0)=rsin(θ)whenrayisclosestθ=90hencermin=Rsin(θ)
Note however, the theta is not the angle initially given , find it by using snells law at boundary (air-glass)
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
θ=90?
I now have understood how you got the first step,but how did you conclude that minimum will occur whenLog in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
thirdly, if the ray was along the radius initially, then too my equations would hold , you may check it,, infact in ur equations i believe you have taken theta as polar angle, please see, this problem should obviously have radial symmetry , and hence the result can never explicitly depend on theta because then it would mean that it actually matters what axes you choose to define the system,,,
NOTE it, my theta is not the polar angle, it is the local angle of incidence
Log in to reply
θ.Please think.
let us assume that the ray never bended,then it went in a straight line,if it goes in a straight line then minimum distance = rsinLog in to reply
θ
I chose the axis like that to reduce the calculations.Also,please consider the thought i gave,the minimum distance should be greater than rsinθ+dθ it will be θ+dθ+dα
I was trying the problem again using snell's law,you should also take into consideration the fact that the normal is changing continuously,thus the angle will not beLog in to reply
I posted this as a question a few months ago. So feel free to go solve that. :) Parallel slabs? I think not!
Log in to reply
By any chance are you in FIITJEE?Also were you able to solve it when it came in CM test?Were the faculty able to solve it.?
Log in to reply
Yes, I am from FIITJEE Kochi. And I couldn't solve it during the test... I did solve it when I got home though. And yea, our faculty also couldn't solve it. Btw, how is AITS going for you?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Hii...Q..23-14(25%-20)£22=?
Log in to reply
I am unable to understand