Let be an integer. Consider an chessboard consisting of unit squares. A configuration of rooks on this board is peaceful if every row and every column contains exactly one rook. Find the greatest positive integer such that, for each peaceful configuration of roots, there is a square which does not contain a rook on any of its unit squares.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The answer is ⌊n−1⌋. Rather simple for an IMO P2; I suppose it's a C2 in the shortlist. The main idea is to tile the grid into several disjoint j2×j2 tiles where j=⌊n−1⌋. I have posted my solution in AoPS, I can post it here if necessary. :)
Log in to reply
Could you please post the full solution for this problem?
I didn't like the phrasing of this question because it was slightly ambiguous.
- It wasn't clear to me that k should depend on n. Would have preferred if they called it kn instead.
- It wasn't clear if the square have to be consecutive rows and columns, or could be a sub-matrix (i.e. you get to pick k rows and k columns). I'm guessing the answer is "have to be consecutive".
Log in to reply
Since k×k is a square, it has to be consecutive.
Conjecture: k=⌊2n⌋
Log in to reply
xxxx
seems to be a counterexample to n=4. There is no 2×2 (consecutive) square.
Log in to reply
My mistake, I thought we're finding the maximum value of k.
Log in to reply
n roots". I've noticed that you made a similar interpretation error in another problem, which asked for the "smallest needed", which could be interpreted as "the most ever".
It is "for each peaceful configuration ofOtherwise, your solution works for the problem that you're solving.
If k>⌊2n⌋, there will be (n−k) rows and (n−k) columns left, which is not enough to put all rooks, because 2(n−k)=2n−2k<n.