This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
I'm surprised that Euler's Formula, eπi+1=0, isn't mentioned in the video. It might not necessarily be the most useful formula around, but it sure can be beautiful.
I should point out that it listed the definition of the derivative when it mentioned the fundamental theorem of calculus... oops? It appears it also confused topology with topography when mentioning Euler's formula for polyhedra (i.e. the Euler characteristic for planar graphs).
Well, we start off with knowing the basic formula, then extend it to a more general case as we become familiar with the subject. For example, when you started learning about force and acceleration, you learn that F=ma. However, that only holds when the mass is a constant. In fact, F=dtdmv, which is the rate of change of momentum. When m is a constant, then dtdm=0, so the chain rule gives us F=dtdm⋅v+mdtdv=ma.
Likewise, we can consider the Pythagorean theorem a specialized case of the Cosine rule. However, I don't think you will say that Pythagorean theorem is wrong.
Absolutely to the point !!!! The Pythagoras theorem however famous is a special case of the cosine rule which accounts for all angles of a triangle .... also i found that the special relativity formula was given for a special case where the object in question is at rest !!!! Still a valiant and daring attempt to select only 10 knowing that they'll be tons of detractors !!!
@Jaydutt Kulkarni
–
And, employing a mathematician's faithful penchant for generalization...
When we get into something called differential geometry, we encounter things called "Riemannian manifolds," which are, essentially, manifolds with a metric tensor. The metric tensor for Rn (where n is a positive integer) is simply the identity matrix of order n, so the "cosine rule" and Pythagorean Theorem reduce to their familiar forms. The more general rule is given by the metric tensor if we want to talk about noneuclidean spaces.
Wolfram's "Mathworld" gives a decent introduction, though it is not in any way rigorous.
But in the video it directly puts that it "explains behavior of objects at very high speeds" which makes p definitely not 0, so it contradicts itself. :D
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I'm surprised that Euler's Formula, eπi+1=0, isn't mentioned in the video. It might not necessarily be the most useful formula around, but it sure can be beautiful.
Log in to reply
That isn't a formula, is an identity.
Log in to reply
Ah, true, pardon my mistake.
Then take eix=cosx+isinx
Log in to reply
I should point out that it listed the definition of the derivative when it mentioned the fundamental theorem of calculus... oops? It appears it also confused topology with topography when mentioning Euler's formula for polyhedra (i.e. the Euler characteristic for planar graphs).
|adj [ adj { . . . ( adj A )] | where A is of nth order and adjoint is for x times = |A| ^ [ (n-1)^x ]
E = mc^2 fail
Real thing E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2, with p momentum
More info
So.... Yeah
Funny how they get the most important equation wrong XD
Log in to reply
Well, we start off with knowing the basic formula, then extend it to a more general case as we become familiar with the subject. For example, when you started learning about force and acceleration, you learn that F=ma. However, that only holds when the mass is a constant. In fact, F=dtdmv, which is the rate of change of momentum. When m is a constant, then dtdm=0, so the chain rule gives us F=dtdm⋅v+mdtdv=ma.
Likewise, we can consider the Pythagorean theorem a specialized case of the Cosine rule. However, I don't think you will say that Pythagorean theorem is wrong.
Minute physics rocks though!
Log in to reply
Absolutely to the point !!!! The Pythagoras theorem however famous is a special case of the cosine rule which accounts for all angles of a triangle .... also i found that the special relativity formula was given for a special case where the object in question is at rest !!!! Still a valiant and daring attempt to select only 10 knowing that they'll be tons of detractors !!!
Log in to reply
When we get into something called differential geometry, we encounter things called "Riemannian manifolds," which are, essentially, manifolds with a metric tensor. The metric tensor for Rn (where n is a positive integer) is simply the identity matrix of order n, so the "cosine rule" and Pythagorean Theorem reduce to their familiar forms. The more general rule is given by the metric tensor if we want to talk about noneuclidean spaces.
Wolfram's "Mathworld" gives a decent introduction, though it is not in any way rigorous.
While I'm on the topic of differential geometry, where is the generalized Stokes' Theorem in that video?
But in the video it directly puts that it "explains behavior of objects at very high speeds" which makes p definitely not 0, so it contradicts itself. :D