The previous transformation law cannot be true if the speed of light is a constant in every frame. Consider measuring the speed of light in frame via our previous definition . We have
In other words, no velocity remains unchanged so this transformation law can't be right if the speed of light is the same in every reference frame. Therefore, to agree with observation we need to properly define how the coordinates (which, after all, are the values of physical clocks and rulers) of relatively moving reference frames relate. This is the domain of special relativity, which we will get to in the next set.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Why do we take it for granted that the velocity of light is a constant?
Log in to reply
we don't. We experimemt a observe the speed of light is a constant.