This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
The 2nd limit isn't a valid one,the function you're taking the limit of is 0 for all x (anything multiplied by 0 will give 0),but the first one is valid since the function x8 approaches 0 as x→∞.I think you multiplied both sides by x then switched the limit to the RHS,this is not valid as you can't multiply by the variable in a limit equation as you did,multiplying by a constant is valid though.
and to answer your second question,it's a whole number
One of the problems if we went ahead and accepted the second limit to be true is that we can replace 8 with another number and still get an equivalent answer.
So, the second limit would be simultaneously equal to two numbers - which creates a contradiction, which is not acceptable in mathematics.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The 2nd limit isn't a valid one,the function you're taking the limit of is 0 for all x (anything multiplied by 0 will give 0),but the first one is valid since the function x8 approaches 0 as x→∞.I think you multiplied both sides by x then switched the limit to the RHS,this is not valid as you can't multiply by the variable in a limit equation as you did,multiplying by a constant is valid though.
and to answer your second question,it's a whole number
I think 0 is not a number. It shows there is nothing.Just like infinite which shows there is everything. But other numbers show something.
One of the problems if we went ahead and accepted the second limit to be true is that we can replace 8 with another number and still get an equivalent answer.
So, the second limit would be simultaneously equal to two numbers - which creates a contradiction, which is not acceptable in mathematics.
I think you can't do this because the limit is written
limx→x0f(x)=l
and so 8 and x are strictly linked (they are f(x)) in your equation and you can't do what you have done.