Inspired by Abhishek Sharma

Find all functions f(x):RR f(x) : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} which satisfy

f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+2xy.f(x+y) = f(x) + f(y)+2xy.

Hint: If rr is a rational number, what can we say about f(rk) f(rk) for any kk ?

Prove that these are the only possible ones.

Note:
1. It is not sufficient to just find a family of solutions.
2. You may not assume that f(x) f(x) is continuous or differentiable.
3. There is more than 1 function that satisfies those conditions.


Inspiration

#Algebra

Note by Calvin Lin
6 years ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

For any additive function h(x)h(x) the function f(x)=h(x)+x2f(x)=h(x)+x^2 satisfies the equation. So there can be infinitely many wild solutions without additional constraints.

Jubayer Nirjhor - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

Right, in particular, let {1,π,v3,v4,} \{ 1, \pi, v_3, v_4, \ldots \} be a rational basis for the reals, then for x=r1+r2π+rivi x = r_1 + r_2 \pi + \sum r_i v_i , we could define

f(x)=r1+2r2+x2 f(x)= r_1 + 2r_2 + x ^2

Such a function is neither differentiable, nor continuous.

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years ago

By definition, f(r(k+1))=f(kr)+f(r)+2r2k(1)f(r(k+1))=f(kr)+f(r)+2r^{2}k\quad---(1)

Through pattern recognition of f(kr)k=2k=5{f(kr)}_{k=2}^{k=5} in terms of f(r)f(r), it seems to follow the relation:

f(kr)=kf(r)+k(k1)r2(2)f(kr)=kf(r)+k(k-1)r^{2} \quad --- (2) of which is directly derived from (1)(1)

If this is the only solution, f(n)f(n) has to have only 11 value, where nn is any real number, which is dependent on the definition of the question. For instance, in the inspiration question, f(1)f(1) is defined to be 44 and only 44.

Is this complete?

Julian Poon - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

What is the value of f(π) f ( \pi ) , if f(1)=4 f(1) = 4 ?

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

For that, Chew-Seong Cheong has already given the answer, which is π2+3π\pi^{2} + 3\pi, assuming the function is continuous.

For a general case, if given f(r)f(r), f(x)f(x) can be found if it is continuous.

Using Chew-Seong Cheong's method,

f(x+r)=f(x)+f(r)+2rxf(x+r)f(x)=f(r)+2rxf(x+r)=f(x)+f(r)+2rx\\ f(x+r)-f(x)=f(r)+2rx

So, f(x+r)=k=1xr(f(r)+2kr2)+f(r)f(x+r)=\sum _{ k=1 }^{ \frac { x }{ r } }{ (f(r)+2k{ r }^{ 2 }) } +f(r)

Therefore, f(x+r)=xf(r)r+x(x+r)+f(r)=x2+(r+f(r)r)x+f(r)=(x+r)2+(f(r)rr)(x+r)f(x+r)=\frac { xf(r) }{ r } +x\left( x+r \right) +f(r)\\ ={ x }^{ 2 }+\left( r+\frac { f(r) }{ r } \right) x+f(r)\\ ={ (x+r) }^{ 2 }+\left( \frac { f(r) }{ r } -r \right) \left( x+r \right)

f(x)=x2+(f(r)rr)x\boxed{f(x)={ x }^{ 2 }+\left( \frac { f(r) }{ r } -r \right) x}

Julian Poon - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon It is true that "If the function is continuous, then f(x)=x2+3x f(x) = x^2 + 3x .

However, since your argument never uses the condition that the function is continuous, hence it is flawed. The error is that you made the assumption that xr \frac{x}{r} is an integer, otherwise your summation is meaningless. It could be adjusted to the case where xr \frac{x}{r} is a rational number, but cannot apply to the case of irrational numbers. In particular, we don't know what f(π) f(\pi ) is.

So, how do we use the condition of continuity (but not differentiability) to prove it?

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin I don't know... Any clues? :D

Julian Poon - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon Hint: What is f(3),f(3.1),f(3.14),f(3.141),f(3.1415),f(3.14159),... f(3), f(3.1), f(3.14), f(3.141), f(3.1415), f(3.14159), ... ?

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin So we just have to approximate as we get closer and closer to π\pi? Probably finding the upper and lower boundaries?

Julian Poon - 6 years ago

Log in to reply

@Julian Poon Yes, and no.

If a function is continuous, then f(π)=limf(xi) f( \pi ) = \lim f(x_i) for any series of points that converge to π \pi . We can pick \( x_i = 10^{-i} \lfloor 10^i \pi \rfloor as I did above.

The idea of upper and lower boundaries would apply for "increasing functions", which doesn't require the assumption of continuity. In this case, we have f(3)f(3.1)f(3.14)f(π)f(3.15)f(3.2)f(4). f(3) \leq f(3.1) \leq f(3.14) \ldots \leq f( \pi ) \leq \ldots f(3.15) \leq f(3.2) \leq f(4) .

Because the inner inequalities converge to each other, we get the result (without assuming continuity).

The take home is that for such functional equations, you have to be careful to work with exactly what you are given, instead of adding additional assumptions because it makes your working simpler.

@Abhishek Sharma See the above and it's relevance to "assume function extends to real numbers and is differentiable".

Calvin Lin Staff - 6 years ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...