Find all functions which satisfy
Hint: If is a rational number, what can we say about for any ?
Prove that these are the only possible ones.
Note:
1. It is not sufficient to just find a family of solutions.
2. You may not assume that is continuous or differentiable.
3. There is more than 1 function that satisfies those conditions.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
For any additive function h(x) the function f(x)=h(x)+x2 satisfies the equation. So there can be infinitely many wild solutions without additional constraints.
Log in to reply
Right, in particular, let {1,π,v3,v4,…} be a rational basis for the reals, then for x=r1+r2π+∑rivi, we could define
f(x)=r1+2r2+x2
Such a function is neither differentiable, nor continuous.
By definition, f(r(k+1))=f(kr)+f(r)+2r2k−−−(1)
Through pattern recognition of f(kr)k=2k=5 in terms of f(r), it seems to follow the relation:
f(kr)=kf(r)+k(k−1)r2−−−(2) of which is directly derived from (1)
If this is the only solution, f(n) has to have only 1 value, where n is any real number, which is dependent on the definition of the question. For instance, in the inspiration question, f(1) is defined to be 4 and only 4.
Is this complete?
Log in to reply
What is the value of f(π), if f(1)=4?
Log in to reply
For that, Chew-Seong Cheong has already given the answer, which is π2+3π, assuming the function is continuous.
For a general case, if given f(r), f(x) can be found if it is continuous.
Using Chew-Seong Cheong's method,
f(x+r)=f(x)+f(r)+2rxf(x+r)−f(x)=f(r)+2rx
So, f(x+r)=k=1∑rx(f(r)+2kr2)+f(r)
Therefore, f(x+r)=rxf(r)+x(x+r)+f(r)=x2+(r+rf(r))x+f(r)=(x+r)2+(rf(r)−r)(x+r)
f(x)=x2+(rf(r)−r)x
Log in to reply
f(x)=x2+3x.
It is true that "If the function is continuous, thenHowever, since your argument never uses the condition that the function is continuous, hence it is flawed. The error is that you made the assumption that rx is an integer, otherwise your summation is meaningless. It could be adjusted to the case where rx is a rational number, but cannot apply to the case of irrational numbers. In particular, we don't know what f(π) is.
So, how do we use the condition of continuity (but not differentiability) to prove it?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
f(3),f(3.1),f(3.14),f(3.141),f(3.1415),f(3.14159),...?
Hint: What isLog in to reply
π? Probably finding the upper and lower boundaries?
So we just have to approximate as we get closer and closer toLog in to reply
If a function is continuous, then f(π)=limf(xi) for any series of points that converge to π. We can pick \( x_i = 10^{-i} \lfloor 10^i \pi \rfloor as I did above.
The idea of upper and lower boundaries would apply for "increasing functions", which doesn't require the assumption of continuity. In this case, we have f(3)≤f(3.1)≤f(3.14)…≤f(π)≤…f(3.15)≤f(3.2)≤f(4).
Because the inner inequalities converge to each other, we get the result (without assuming continuity).
The take home is that for such functional equations, you have to be careful to work with exactly what you are given, instead of adding additional assumptions because it makes your working simpler.
@Abhishek Sharma See the above and it's relevance to "assume function extends to real numbers and is differentiable".