Let a and b be positive integers with a =/= b. I checked, if the four most common Hölder-means (AM, GM, QM, HM) of a and b could then also be an integer. As expected this is the case for each of them seperately. I went one step further and checked, if two of these means could be integers at the same time (For a,b<5000). And for every combination of these Hölder means, except!!! for GM-QM there were plenty of solutions. I tried to find a proof, why there shouldn't be distinct integers a and b, for which the geometric and quadratic means aren't both integers, but I didn't succeed.
So, please help me and either find these tupels, or proof, that they can't exist.
Thanks in advance
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Here's a proof that uses some descent ideas. First suppose m=ab,n=2a2+b2 with a,b,m,n all integers. Now, if gcd(a,b)=g, then g∣m and g∣n, and replacing a,b,m,n with a/g,b/g,m/g,n/g gives another solution. So we can assume that a,b are relatively prime.
Now, m2=ab with a,b relatively prime implies that a and b are squares. So let a=c2,b=d2. The remaining equation is 2n2=c4+d4. This is a typical application of infinite descent, which I will just give a reference to. The unique solution for coprime c,d is c=d=1, which implies a=b.
Hi Gerrit, this seems like a very interesting problem. It could probably be generalised (by someone smarter than me) that a result holds for the n variable means, not just with 2 variables. It is obvious that for a=b, we can find a solution, since the equality of the means all hold. For distinct integers, I have had a think and come up with the reasoning below. It could be (and probably is!) not true and I've made a slip, but this is why I think there is no a and b:
Assume that a and b satisfy the conditions. m=ab n=2a2+b2 Squaring the first one and then multiplying by two, as well as squaring the second one gives us, 2m2=2ab 2n2=a2+b2 Subtracting, 2n2−2m2=a2−2ab+b2 2(n−m)(n+m)=(a−b)2 Now from the bit that says 2n2=a2+b2, we see that the LHS is even, meaning that either both a and b are odd, or they are both even. This means that whatever the case, a−b is even. Let 2j=a−b where j is an integer. 2(n−m)(n+m)=(2j)2 (n−m)(n+m)=2j2 As the RHS is now even, the LHS must also be. However, if one of the brackets is even, the other must be as well (a reason why the difference of two squares is never in the form 4p+2). This makes the LHS a multiple of 4, and dividing by 2, we get that j2 must be even, meaning j is even. Now let 2k=j such that a−b=4k. 2(n−m)(n+m)=(4k)2 (n−m)(n+m)=8k2 Since we know that the LHS is a multiple of 4, we can let (n−m)(n+m)=4p. p=2k2 This makes p even, so we can express it as 2q and so on and so on. We can repeat this logic infinitely, showing that either side is a multiple of 2. Since we can't keep producing integers infinitely, we have a contradiction, and no such a and b exist.
Log in to reply
I don't think this quite works. Or at least I don't see how it rules out, say, n=3,m=1,a−b=4. When you get to the bottom you get k=1, but I don't see why there is an argument that k must be even. I guess the sentence I don't understand is "we can repeat this logic infinitely."
Log in to reply
It probably doesn't. If I have made mistake then maybe my method could be adapted to get either an answer or a proof as to why there aren't solutions