Hi, I found out something interesting about perfect squares and I would like to share it.
I don't know if anyone knew this, but I believe that most of you might knew this.
This is a quite easier way to find the square of a large number
Alright, let's start with two unknowns. I'll take and while
As we knew that and , we can change to be
Now, we have a simplified version of
Let's try and
And 16 is indeed equal to
So it worked! Yeah!
Now let's try a larger number, 501
If
Try it in your calculator and you will find it true
Alright, that's all. Thanks everyone for viewing this.
Try this problem to see if you understand it
Follow me to get more interesting questions and notes
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Why complicate the matter when you have got such a nice formula that you have been learning since "AGES"..... (a^ {2} - b^ {2} ) = (a-b)(a+b)
You can also think of it as this: Suppose x is 10 and y is 11. Imagine you have a square of 100 counters laid out in a 10 by 10 fashion. By adding 10 counters to the right of your grid, you get 110 counters in an 11x10 fashion. Then, add 11 counters to the bottom of the new grid and you get an 11 by 11 SQUARE grid. This shows that x^2+x+y=y^2. This also works for all consecutive numbers (you can try it yourself with counters.) Just another way to think of this method as a whole without using any algebra.
Log in to reply
That was the way I learnt it 0.o
a^2- b^2 = (a+b)(a-b), an EASIER way!
This works is because (x−1)2−x2=2x−1, and as we know, all odds can be written as the sum of two consecutive numbers. But this do save a little time. How about this?
Log in to reply
don't understand the a5b5 part
Log in to reply
I want to clarify that a5 is not a×5, but a5=10a+5.
Well it isn't a simplification since we have to do 3 more operations instead of just one.
(a + 1)^2 = a^2 + 2a + 1 = a^2 + a + (a + 1) just what you had above. Let us see a two digit number.
(10a + b)^2 = 100a^2 + b^2 + 20ab........... (10a - b)^2 = 100a^2 + b^2 - 20ab
Say 63^2 = (60+3)^2 = 3609 + 2018 = 3969 ...............67^ 2 = (70 - 3)^2 = 4909 - 2073 = 4489.
If b < 5 use (10a + b)^2, b > 5 use {(10 +1)a - (10 - b) }^2
If b=5, (10a + 5)^2 = 100a*(a+1) +25