This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I guess this is true for all primes except 3...To disprove this for 3....We see that aaa will always be divisible by 3 because for divisibility by 3 we need to check the sum of digits . The sum of the digits for the given number will be 3a which is divisible by 3..Hence the given number will always be congruent 0 mod 3...
@A Former Brilliant Member
–
You are saying a is a natural number... so you need to change that in the statement. Essentially you are saying this is true for a=1, we can then multiply with a=2..9. The case a=1 is trivial as long as the prime is not 3.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
n timesaaa…aa≡a(modn)n timesaa…−a=n−1 timesaaa…a0≡0(modn)
Now we have to prove that,
n−1 timesaaa…aa≡0(modn),∀n∈ Prime≥7a⋅910n−1−1(modn)
As n is a prime number,
10ϕ(n)=10n−1≡1(modn)∴a⋅910n−1−1≡a⋅91−1=0(modn)
n timesaaa…aa≡a(modn)a⋅910n−1(modn)
By Fermat's Little Theorem,
10n≡10(modn)a⋅910n−1≡a⋅910−1=a(modn)
• QED
Log in to reply
Nice one @Akshat Sharda
Can you prove the Bonus ?@Akshat Sharda
I guess this is true for all primes except 3...To disprove this for 3....We see that aaa will always be divisible by 3 because for divisibility by 3 we need to check the sum of digits . The sum of the digits for the given number will be 3a which is divisible by 3..Hence the given number will always be congruent 0 mod 3...
@Otto Bretscher , I am still waiting for your reply
Log in to reply
I'm afraid that this congruency does not hold in general. As a counterexample, consider a=10 and n=11.
Log in to reply
Its true for all values of a such that a is between 1 and 9
a should not be a 2 digit number...
Log in to reply
a is a natural number... so you need to change that in the statement. Essentially you are saying this is true for a=1, we can then multiply with a=2..9. The case a=1 is trivial as long as the prime is not 3.
You are sayingLog in to reply