This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
There is a simple solution (two steps) via generating functions. In particular, read the 2nd example (in the wiki link) which uses convolutions.
Consider the generating functions which gives us an=(n2n). Let this be denoted by a(x).
Consider the generating functions which gives us bn=4n. Clearly, this is generated by b(x)=1−4x1 from Taylor Series.
Then, the statement claims that
a(x)2=b(x).
All that is left to do, is to show that
a(x)=1−4x1
This is well known. Simply prove that
(n2n)=(−4)n(n−21)
Note I have seen this formula before. In fact, I believe that (but am not certain) it's in Koh Khee Meng's book, which is why that is my immediate approach.
Eh, Azhaghu, I found the integral, I didn't derive it. It's still a tough problem, and I haven't figured out another way to prove it. But I think I can use that integral to help me find a way.
What I can tell you is that in spite of owning a library of books on math and physics, I've come to rely more on the internet to improve on my skills. So, my advice to you would be, "get very good at finding information on the internet". You know, kind of like how I found that integral. Doing a search on "discrete calculus" immediately returns quite a wealth of material, far more than what I can find in my library of books, and, you know, already I'm getting interested in this subject, in looking over this material---that can be had right now and for free on the internet.
My method was similar to what Calvin posted. I wrote this note in the hope that someone had a combinatorial proof or proof by induction which I couldn't figure out.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
There is a simple solution (two steps) via generating functions. In particular, read the 2nd example (in the wiki link) which uses convolutions.
Consider the generating functions which gives us an=(n2n). Let this be denoted by a(x).
Consider the generating functions which gives us bn=4n. Clearly, this is generated by b(x)=1−4x1 from Taylor Series.
Then, the statement claims that
a(x)2=b(x).
All that is left to do, is to show that
a(x)=1−4x1
This is well known. Simply prove that
(n2n)=(−4)n(n−21)
Note I have seen this formula before. In fact, I believe that (but am not certain) it's in Koh Khee Meng's book, which is why that is my immediate approach.
Log in to reply
I don't understand what is (n−1/2)?
Log in to reply
Binomial coefficients. There are negative and fractional binomial coefficients. This allows us to evaluate (1+x)r even when r is not a positive integer. We have
(1+x)r=1+(1r)x+(2r)x2+…
Nice solution. Some other ways would be to use Snake Oil method or Beta Function.
From a paper on inverse elliptic functions and Legendre polynomials, we have
π2∫02π(x2Sin2θ+Cos2θ)ndθ=4n1k=0∑n((2kk)(2(n−k)n−k)x2k)
and so, for x=1, your identity immediately follows. It's left as an exercise to the reader to derive the integral. ;)
Of course, the real challenge is to find another way to prove this very un-obvious identity.
Log in to reply
Sir, you really are worth your title of Mr Mathopedia .
Can you advise me on becoming more knowledgeable (like you) ? And some sources to study Discrete calculus ?
Thanks for the same ⌣¨
Log in to reply
Eh, Azhaghu, I found the integral, I didn't derive it. It's still a tough problem, and I haven't figured out another way to prove it. But I think I can use that integral to help me find a way.
What I can tell you is that in spite of owning a library of books on math and physics, I've come to rely more on the internet to improve on my skills. So, my advice to you would be, "get very good at finding information on the internet". You know, kind of like how I found that integral. Doing a search on "discrete calculus" immediately returns quite a wealth of material, far more than what I can find in my library of books, and, you know, already I'm getting interested in this subject, in looking over this material---that can be had right now and for free on the internet.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Ariel Gershon Just out of curiousity, what was your method?
Log in to reply
My method was similar to what Calvin posted. I wrote this note in the hope that someone had a combinatorial proof or proof by induction which I couldn't figure out.