This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
When that happens, there is no longer any motion between the bottom of the disk and the surface and so there is no kinetic friction to slow the thing down anymore.
In reality there will be rolling friction, which is more complex, but for the purposes of this problem, friction fully disappears when v=ωR and the spinning as well as the forward motion is sustainable by the conservation of linear and angular momentum.
**Edit: I see that in the original post I mistakenly wrote v=ω/R, it is actually v=ωR, if that was the only source of confusion then you probably, already understand the condition, hopefully this clarification can help someone else.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Hey Lokesh, please excuse my brevity:
The spin of the wheel slows down due to friction with the table, so
Iω˙=τ=−RMgμk→ω(t)=ω0−IRMgμkt
Meanwhile, the disc's linear velocity accelerates due to the same frictional force
Mv˙=Mgμk→v(t)=gμkt
The wheel stops slipping when v=ωR so we have
Rgμkt=ω0−IRMgμkt→t=3gμRω
evaluating ω at this point we find ωf=ωi/3
In all of the above, we take I=2MR2
Log in to reply
Why does it stop slipping when v=w/R? Is this just something that is shown experimentally or is it derived mathematically?
Log in to reply
When that happens, there is no longer any motion between the bottom of the disk and the surface and so there is no kinetic friction to slow the thing down anymore.
In reality there will be rolling friction, which is more complex, but for the purposes of this problem, friction fully disappears when v=ωR and the spinning as well as the forward motion is sustainable by the conservation of linear and angular momentum.
**Edit: I see that in the original post I mistakenly wrote v=ω/R, it is actually v=ωR, if that was the only source of confusion then you probably, already understand the condition, hopefully this clarification can help someone else.
Log in to reply
v=ω/R confused me. Thanks!
Yep,Very clear solution. Thank you so much Josh!