Interesting Modulus problem. Kindly Help!

Let t1<t2<t3<<t99 t_1 < t_2 < t_3 < \dots < t_{99} be real numbers. Consider a function f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} given by f(x)=xt1+xt2++xt99f(x) = |x-t_1|+|x-t_2|+ \dots +|x-t_{99}|. Show that f(x)f(x) attains minimum value at x=t50x=t_{50}.

#NumberTheory #HelpMe! #MathProblem #Math

Note by Mridul Sachdeva
7 years, 10 months ago

No vote yet
4 votes

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Let x=mRx=m \in \mathbb{R} be the value such that f(x)f(x) is minimized. Obviously, t1<m<t99t_1<m<t_{99}. Then

mt1+mt99=(mt1)+(t99m)=t99t1, \lvert m - t_1 \rvert + \lvert m - t_{99} \rvert = (m-t_1) + (t_{99} - m)=t_{99} - t_1,

which is independant of mm, so t1t_1 and t99t_{99} can be disregarded. This process of omitting the smallest and largest value continues, until only the middle one is left, which is t50t_{50}, so m=t50m=t_{50}.

Tim Vermeulen - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

How is the assumption t1<m<t99 t_1 < m < t_{99} obvious? I mean I know its correct but can we assume that?

Mridul Sachdeva - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

f(x)f(x) is the sum of distances from xx to tit_i. If for example x>t99x>t_{99}, then moving xx to the left decreases all distances.

Slice A Lot - 7 years, 10 months ago

This is similar to what Tim V. did, but perhaps a bit more rigorous.

By triangle inequality, xtk+xt100kt100ktk|x-t_{k}| + |x - t_{100 - k}| \ge t_{100-k} - t_{k} for k1,49k \in \overline{1,49} with equality iff tkxt100kt_k \le x \le t_{100-k}.

Trivially, xt500|x - t_{50}| \ge 0 with equality iff x=t50x = t_{50}.

Adding these up gives f(x)=xt50+k=149(xtk+xt100k)k=149(t100ktk)f(x) = |x - t_{50}| + \displaystyle\sum_{k = 1}^{49} \left(|x-t_{k}| + |x - t_{100 - k}|\right) \ge \displaystyle\sum_{k = 1}^{49} \left( t_{100-k} - t_{k} \right).

Equality occurs iff tkxt100kt_k \le x \le t_{100-k} for all k1,49k \in \overline{1,49} and x=t50x = t_{50}.

Clearly, x=t50x = t_{50} satisfies those conditions, and is the only real number to do so.

Therefore, f(x)f(x) attains its minimum value at x=t50x = t_{50}.

Jimmy Kariznov - 7 years, 10 months ago

Log in to reply

Nice use of the triangle inequality. Thanks!

Mridul Sachdeva - 7 years, 10 months ago

Intuitively it seems correct but I have not been able to prove it.

Mridul Sachdeva - 7 years, 10 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...