I have played with several numbers with the following rules:
Take a number. (Example 10)
Find the prime factors of the number (if it have) . ( Example 10 have prime factors 2 and 5)
Make a number using those prime factors in ascending order. (Example for 10 it will be 25 as prime factors are 2 and 5)
Now continue the process with the new number you have got. Continue this process until you get a prime number as it will not have any prime factors
Applying the whole process on 10 :
10 => 25 => 55 => 511 => 773
I have applied this procedure on many numbers. And I concluded a statement:
All numbers will eventually fall to a prime through the process
For 8 it was a quiet big task:
8 => 222 => 2337 => 31941 => 33371313 => 311123771 => 7149317941 => 22931219729 => 112084656339 => 3347911118189 => 11613496501723 => 97130517917327 => 531832651281459 => 3331113965338635107
Another incredible number was 20 and I am unable to obtain a prime yet. You can try it yourself.
You should also try out if you can find any number not falling to a prime, or if you can prove or disprove my statement.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
This is quite intriguing Sahar! I immediately decided to try writing a program which would go through this process, but quickly realized that finding the prime factorization of numbers larger than 100,000,000 is quite taxing on a laptop! It took mine about a minute just to get to the fifth iteration for 8!
However, here is something I observed. When I set a cutoff in my program which ended the process when it hit numbers larger than 20,000,000, here are the numbers which were ended between 2 and 200:
8, 16, 20, 40, 44, 48, 49, 64, 65, 77, 78, 80, 81, 86, 87, 91, 96, 104, 105, 112, 116, 120, 123, 124, 126, 128, 129, 130, 132, 135, 136, 144, 146, 150, 160, 161, 164, 168, 169, 170, 176, 178, 180, 184, 185, 186, 188, 190, 192, 195, 196
Interestingly, many of these numbers come in consecutive pairs (for instance 77 and 78). This could easily change for higher cutoff values of course.
Hopefully someone else has some more insight!