This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Well, inverse Laplace transforms aside, if the question is about the physical meaning of the 2nd derivative of the impulse function, which can be approximated with a Gaussian function, then we can propose this chart, where J is the impulse function
J = integral of force over time, or change in momentum
J′ = measure of rise (or fall) of force over time (this would be "jerk" in mechanics)
J′′ = measure of acceleration (or de-acceleration) of force over time (this should not be confused with ordinary acceleration--no forces are associated with this term)
The more "pointy" the Gaussian function becomes, the more it becomes like the true impulse or Dirac Delta function, so we could use this as a kind of an index for this. That is, if
J=aπ1e−a2x2
then
J′′(0)=−a2π2
So we just have a knob, a, in which we can vary from a continuous application of force to the special case where the application of force is discrete and instantaneous.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Well, inverse Laplace transforms aside, if the question is about the physical meaning of the 2nd derivative of the impulse function, which can be approximated with a Gaussian function, then we can propose this chart, where J is the impulse function
J = integral of force over time, or change in momentum
J′ = measure of rise (or fall) of force over time (this would be "jerk" in mechanics)
J′′ = measure of acceleration (or de-acceleration) of force over time (this should not be confused with ordinary acceleration--no forces are associated with this term)
The more "pointy" the Gaussian function becomes, the more it becomes like the true impulse or Dirac Delta function, so we could use this as a kind of an index for this. That is, if
J=aπ1e−a2x2
then
J′′(0)=−a2π2
So we just have a knob, a, in which we can vary from a continuous application of force to the special case where the application of force is discrete and instantaneous.