No number is equal to any other no. except itself Stupid statement, isn't it?? Well, you might think that I declare it as stupid, and it is accepted worldwide. But here… Take a rational x and its negative,i.e., -x. Square them, and they becomex^{2}. Now, They are equal. Hence, taking square root on both sides, we get: X=-X Hence, disproved
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
u should go a bit deeper inside ur proof .....for a correct mathematical proof i think counts in it all the possible perspstives .....:-)
Log in to reply
Well, the proof is never the basis. I am waiting for a counter-statement
Log in to reply
Just look here my friend
Let's oversimplify it ,
x^2=x^2 1st condition ,
xx=xx
2nd condition,
(-x) *(-x) = x * x
Now , you divide the whole equation by x, you see
x=x , you can only remove x from the equation not ( -1)*(-1)
That's why I said you should consider all possible perspectives ..!!
There is no such number where its predecessor or its successor is the negative value of itself, just looking at the number 1, it has a predecessor of 0, and a successor of 2, neither equaling -1.
Log in to reply
Have a good look at it bro!!!
Log in to reply
be careful with squares and square roots , think once again for a while
Log in to reply
@megh choksi ???
What happened