The post by Kevin Chung reminded me of an interesting equation, proposed to me by a friend.
Problem. Prove that there no non-trivial rational solutions to the equation
Solution. If we multiplicate original equation by , we'll obtain two similar equations. Lets write them all down
Now we may try to think backwards. Could possibly a system of linear equations with rational coefficients give an irrational solution? Applying Cramer's rule we see that it's not the case. However, our system clearly has a solution . Which contradicts the assumption that are rational numbers (keep in mind that we throw trivial solution away).
Can you propose any generalizations? What features of the tuple does this relation imply? Have you noticed how this relation is similar to conditions of linear independence?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
I think , there exist a very simple solution , Since a+b32+c34=0⟹a3+2b3+4c3=6abc Also , WLOG we can assume a,b,c∈Z Now we must have a even , this will then give b even , and further going , by FMI(Fermat method of infinite descent , we get contradiction.
Log in to reply
Indeed very clever and beautiful solution!
If I may provide a "better" solution...
We note that we are considering arbitrary elements of Q(32). Also note that the minimal polynomial of 32 over Q is x3−2, which has degree 3. Thus, [Q(32):Q]=3, so we have that Q(32) is a vector space over Q with basis {1,32,(32)2}. Thus, there cannot be a nontrivial solution to a+b32+c34=0 because {1,32,(32)2} is linearly independent.
Log in to reply
Bravissimo, that is exactly what I expected -- a larger context! Any ideas how to broaden the result? Maybe some more general equations?
Log in to reply
I don't follow what you're saying. How would you like me to generalize?
What is Cramer's rule??
Log in to reply
It's one of the methods for solving systems of linear equations.. If you haven't studied matrix before, that'll be touch job for you. =3=
Google for that because I don't know how to explain that easily. T__T