Here is a proof that log2 = 0. This is not true but can you spot the wrong step in it.
log(1+x)=i=1∑∞k(−1)kxk=x−2x2+3x3−4x4+5x5−6x6+……Putting x = 1log2=1−21+31−41+51−61+……log2=1+21+31+41+51+⋯−2(21+41+61+81+101+…)log2=ζ(1)−22(1+21+31+41+51+…)log2=ζ(1)−ζ(1)log2=0Hence Proved
#Calculus
#Series
#RiemannZetaFunction
#Proofs
#Paradox
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
ζ(1)=∞
ζ(1)−ζ(1)=∞−∞=0
Log in to reply
Thanks !
Yeah, absolutely right.
ζ(1) does not converge. So the statement ζ(1)−ζ(1)=0 is like saying ∞−∞=0 which is wrong because it is indeterminate.
Log in to reply
Thanks !
Watch the limits in which the Taylor series converges. We are given that ∣x∣<1, and hence we cannot apply this to the case where x=1 or x=−1, to find the value of log2 or log0.
Similarly, we cannot apply the Geometric Progression sum of 1−x1=1+x+x2+x3+… to conclude that 01=1+1+1+1+… or that 21=1−1+1−1+…, because x=1,−1 are out of the range in which the formula applies.
Log in to reply
Thanks a Lot
@Sandeep Bhardwaj @Calvin Lin @Ronak Agarwal @Mvs Saketh @Azhaghu Roopesh M
Log in to reply
Rajdeep did u understand all this??? It was really out of my mind!!
Log in to reply
I came up with this proof.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
@Manish Dash you are a total genius. In Open proof contest can I send snapshots or a word file.
Yep! I totally agree withLog in to reply
Alternatively, this works as a proof that the harmonic series diverges.