Every person who loves math would , at some point of time come across this question. If it is a discovery, what are the reasons? Providing examples from history does not prove the point! Was counting created by humans or was it borrowed from other creatures on this planet? If it was an invention, what made the man transform from counting numbers orally to give a structure to it?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
It all depends on what exactly is an invention and what is a discovery.
To me it's clear cut:
Mathematics is the the theory behind the workings of the world. It's the structure of the world, the order that the world follows.
Mathematics would still exist without humans or animals. The world wouldn't spin into chaos, the structure would remain. Mathematics just IS. It CAN'T be an invention.
We humans have a gift of being able to discover the structures that exist. The only thing we invented are the words to descibe it.
Even Peano's Axiom's are just a means to descibe what is there!
Log in to reply
I'd say the theory behind the workings of the world to be physics instead of mathematics. Mathematics generalize and abstract the world further than physics; these generalizations must certainly be inventions, since there's no rigorous reason of why we should generalize them in this way.
Regarding definitions, I'd say a "discovery" to be something that can be rigorously reasoned (although it might take a fantastic leap of logic to think of that discovery before starting to reason it), and an "invention" to be something that can't be rigorously reasoned. "Rigorously reasoned" simply means following the rules of logic, just like all proofs must be rigorous.
Log in to reply
My personal opinion is that physics is applied mathematics ;)
While nature can't be an invention, but counting numbers which is fundamental is an invention. I mean, numbers aren't invented but counting is!
To me Math is a discovery, just like magic squares and many other fascinating aspects of Math in our world. We discover Math because even if humans have not known of Math, Math still exists in our world, in nature. So how can we say we invented Math when we just got the knowledge of it from our world?
Log in to reply
Just my opinion :)
Log in to reply
There is absolutely nothing wrong in ur opinion! The main idea behind this post is to know how people think! There is no one correct answer to this question!
Log in to reply
firstly natural numbers existed in the sense that they occurred naturally .. !! for eg.. a shepherd who could guarantee that the number of sheep he took for grazing are exactly the same as he had before ; by having an account of the stones (he took originally the same number as sheep he had before). One stone in the pocket means that one sheep is in .. and as soon as all the stones are in his pocket he will be sure that the sheep are well in .. !! this accounts for thee counting you just mentioned .. and later on the man transformed it to a subject which had many applications .
Log in to reply
Yes, but what made man transform these simple techniques to a set of rules? is it inquisitiveness or simplicity?
Math is both invention and discovery. We just define axioms "arbitrarily" (Peano's axioms generate the natural numbers, for example). But we find that they mesh together beautifully, and we start actively discovering things that can be derived from them. It's invention that makes math to exist, but discovery that makes math an active subject.
Log in to reply
Is it the invention that preceeded the discovery or vice-versa? This leads to a situation like "Egg first or hen first?"
Log in to reply
Huh. That one is interesting. I'd say invention goes first; they invented an "infinite number of axioms" called the natural numbers (that 1 is a "single object", whatever that means, 2 follows 1, 3 follows 2, and so on), and then they discover the rules of addition perhaps, and perhaps the concepts of fractions and real numbers and elementary functions and calculus and more, until finally Peano makes this natural numbers more succinct by his axioms thus rigorously completing the base.
Invention (of natural numbers) goes first, but they expand both ways quickly; math is continuously invented while also being discovered.
well actually we have invented mathematics as in mathematics sometimes we can make some axiom and then find other deductions from it and these axioms can be anything.like as we study plane geometry,but actually there is nothing like a plane we just imagine it,in actual sense we use spherical geometry and its laws are very different from plane geometry.this is the difference between physics and mathematics
I think its is an invention at its base. As in creation of the mathematical "Universe". Once the basic rules are set, the rest becomes a discovery.
Extending the analogy, I say natural numbers map to our home, the place which we start "discovering" as kids. Rational numbers to our city and Real numbers to our country... And the higher concepts map to other planets and systems and galaxies..
math was basically a necisstity for humans...just try to take out math from daily life and you will know it's importance.it was indeed an invention.
Log in to reply
Each and everything has it's own importance! We cannot live without physics and neither chemistry! But, how do u support your claim?
it is an discovery