Prove that :
\[1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + .... + \frac{1}{n} \notin \mathbb{Z} (\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}) \]
Prove :
Assume 1+21+31+....+n1∈/Z
So that :
1+21+31+....+n1=ba;(a,b)=1
We must demonstrate : 1+21+31+....+n+11∈/Z
Pretend that : 1+21+31+....+n+11∈Z
⇒ba+n+11∈Z
⇒b(n+1)a(n+1)+b∈Z
⇒a(n+1)+b⋮b(n+1)
By (a,b) = 1 then n+1⋮b and b⋮n+1
so n+1=b
But :
1+21+31+....+n1=n+1a=n!c
Thus,
n!⋮n+1;(absurdity)
Therefore : 1+21+31+....+n1∈/Z(∀n∈Z)
Thanks in advance ~!!
#NumberTheory
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Good attempt. However, there is an error in the last line. So what if we have n+1a=n!c? Why does that mean that n!∣n+1? For example, 42=63, and 4 and 6 do not divide each other.
If instead you want to argue that n+1∣n!, then consider n=5.
Log in to reply
Thanks sir, but am I in the right track to moving on or i should change my methods ? Thanks in advance !
Log in to reply
You are most likely on the wrong track, in that I believe there is no solution arising from your current approach.
See Pi Han's comment stream for suggestions on how to solve this problem.
A simpler approach is to apply Bertrand's Postulate.
Log in to reply
That is an overkill for this problem. There is a much simpler approach.
Log in to reply
Yes. It involves the highest power of 2.