This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Here's what I submitted. FYI this is the awesomest problem in the whole world!
We use mathematical induction. WLOG, because we are only considering terms mod7, we can assume that all terms are 1,2,3,4,5,6, or 7. There are two super-general cases for some arbitrary 7-term subset.
Case 1: They can all be the same, such as 1,1,1,1,1,1,1.
Case 2: They can all be different, such as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.
Obviously, for either one of these conditions, their sum is divisible by 7. Can we create a 37-term set so that neither of these cases is fulfilled? Let’s try having 61’s, 62’s, 63’s, etc. As soon as we’ve reached 66’s, we are at a dilemma. If we put 7, then we'll have a "Case 2" subset of 7 different numbers. If we put anything else, we’ll already have 6 of them and we'll have created a "Case 1". So we can never get to 37 without fulfilling one of these general cases. In fact, we haven't even proven that there isn't a way to have a 7-term subset divisible by 7 in this 36-term set. But that doesn't matter! We’re finished! Great problem! :D
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Here's what I submitted. FYI this is the awesomest problem in the whole world!
We use mathematical induction. WLOG, because we are only considering terms mod7, we can assume that all terms are 1,2,3,4,5,6, or 7. There are two super-general cases for some arbitrary 7-term subset.
Case 1: They can all be the same, such as 1,1,1,1,1,1,1.
Case 2: They can all be different, such as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.
Obviously, for either one of these conditions, their sum is divisible by 7. Can we create a 37-term set so that neither of these cases is fulfilled? Let’s try having 6 1’s, 6 2’s, 6 3’s, etc. As soon as we’ve reached 6 6’s, we are at a dilemma. If we put 7, then we'll have a "Case 2" subset of 7 different numbers. If we put anything else, we’ll already have 6 of them and we'll have created a "Case 1". So we can never get to 37 without fulfilling one of these general cases. In fact, we haven't even proven that there isn't a way to have a 7-term subset divisible by 7 in this 36-term set. But that doesn't matter! We’re finished! Great problem! :D
Log in to reply
@Yan Yau Cheng In my submission, I see you marked a point off of one of my proof problems. Which one was it and why? Thanks. :D