Consider a sequence of increasing positive integers such that is a perfect square for all positive integers .
If , then the values of are all unique. However, is not unique because its possible values are 132, 204, 720 and 3612.
Prove that it is impossible to find a suitable value of such that all the subsequent terms () are unique.
P.S: I don't know whether I'm right or not. This is just a hunch.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
So it's pretty clear that tm+1 is unique if and only if t12+⋯+tm2 is the square of a prime. Call that prime pm; then pm=2pm−12+1. So the question is whether the recursive sequence p1=p,pm=2pm−12+1 can ever produce only primes. E.g. for p=3, the sequence goes 3,5,13,85, and then p4 is not prime so t5 is not unique.
This seems unlikely, but I don't have a proof. I did some numerical experiments; the only prime p<106 for which the first five values of the sequence are all primes is p=169219.
What do you get for t2,t3,t4,t5? Am I making a mistake to say t2=4,t3=12,t4=84, and then t5 is ambiguous? (Could be 204 or 720 or 3612?)
I suspect you're right, and it shouldn't be too hard, but let me just make sure I'm not missing something first!
Log in to reply
You're right. I've made a blunder. I've rectified the note above. Thanks.