Hello, i would like to provide me a full solution for this equation 2^x + 3^x = 2 I know that the answer is x = 0 but i would like to tell me how i solve it step by step I wonder also if this is a right way to solve it 2^X + 3^X = 1 + 1 => 2^X + 3^X = 2^0 + 3^0 => 2^X = 2^0 AND 3^x = 3^0 so x = 0
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
dxd(2x+3x)=ln(2)2x+ln(3)3x.
ln(2)2x+ln(3)3x>0 so the gradient of 2x+3x is always positive, so 2x+3x must be increasing. Hence 2x+3x can only cross the line y=2 once, so 2x+3x=2 can only have one solution. By observation, x=0 is a solution, and so must be the only solution.
Log in to reply
How you guys latexify the problem at brilliant??
Log in to reply
brilliant.org/math-formatting-guide/
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Thanks
Use \ (Thanks) without the first space.
Log in to reply
Thanks :)
It can also be \ (\text{Thanks}\ ) without spaces which would appear asLog in to reply
Log in to reply
text\(THANKS)$
$this is just my own step but you can ask if there is something you want to add :)
2x+3x=2
Transposing 2x to the right side
3x=2−2x
by the use of logarithm
log3(2−2x)=x
by using the law of logarithm, (2−2x) must be greater than zero because you cannot log the number 0 or any negative number, meaning x<1
so the only integer that satisfies the condition is 0 so x=0
Log in to reply
Thank you for your reply but i cant take for granted that the solution is an integer.
Log of negative numbers is defined, as Calvin Sir has mentioned in some posts. Only log of 0 is not defined.