This week, we continue our study of Group Theory with a guest post by Chu-Wee Lim on Lagrange's Theorem.
You may first choose to read the post on Group Theory if you have not already done so.
Is the following proof correct?
Problem: Show that in the definition of a subgroup, conditions (b) and (c) imply (a).
Proof: Suppose is a subset satisfying (b) and (c). Pick any . By (b), we have and so by (c) we have , which gives us .
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
You can cut the number of conditions for a subgroup down to two. Either
e∈H
if g,h∈H, then gh−1∈H
or
H=∅
if g,h∈H, then gh−1∈H
Either way around, you need to have a condition which guarantees the existence of elements in H. You can conflate conditions (b) and (c), but you can't drop (a).
The assumption that you can pick an h∈H is wrong. Only having conditions (b) and (c) would allow the empty subset to be a subgroup.