Hello Brilliantitians, I've written an article called "Learn Trigonometry in One Day," which I posted here. Share this with anyone you think may want to learn trigonometry! :)
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
I read through the whole thing [except for the 'solutions to the exercises' part]
Here's what I think.
1) It's concise, brief and to-the-point. This can be both good and bad. It would be unfair to assume that someone can learn trigonometry completely from scratch by reading your article. A person needs to have a little background on trigonometry before they can read your article.
2) The way you defined sines and cosines of angles in chapter 1 makes sines and cosines only non-negative. So exercise 1.1 should not ask the reader to prove that sinθ and cosθ are never less than −1.
3) In chapter 2, I'm not sure what you mean by radians are unitless. The radian itself is a unit. It is the unit of angular measure. And the radian does have a symbol, the superscript c [2πc]. But people do not use it as it may give rise to confusion.
4) I'm not totally sure how you do it in the USA, but here we learn complex numbers way after we learn basic trig. Using Euler's formula to derive trig identities is probably not the best way to teach people who are learning trig for the first time.
5) Other than that, I think it's quite well-written with enough diagrams and those are really important while learning trig.
I see that you have other articles on academia. I'm looking forward to reading them later today.
As the ratio of two lengths, the radian is a "pure number" that needs no unit symbol, and in mathematical writing the symbol "rad" is almost always omitted.
@Cody Johnson
–
Notice that I didn't disagree with anything you said.
s=180πrθ where θ is in degrees. Therefore θ is unitless?
Neither θ is unitless. Both θ's have a dimensionless unit.
To say radians are unitless is the same as saying that meters are unitless. Both meters and radians measure a measurable physical quantity. Meters measure length, displacement; radians measure angles, angular displacement. And that's what units do, don't they? They measure stuff.
The only difference between the meter and the radian is one of them has dimensions while the other one doesn't.
It can also be argued that "pure numbers" have units. 1 is the unit for positive integers. ±1, ±i are the units for Gaussian integers.
As the ratio of two lengths, the radian is a "pure number" that needs no unit symbol
I agree. It needs no unit symbol. But does not mean that it is not a unit. A degree is also the ratio of two lengths times a constant.
It all boils down to what you mean by a unit. To me, a unit is a standard amount of a physical quantity. A radian is specifically that. It just happens that the physical quantity it represents has no dimensions.
It's ironic how I taught a few trigonometry and complex number classes to middle and high school students at MIT last week (taught it 3 times). These seminars were one 1 hour long, each. (Not a series, separate classes) and the topics I covered and the approach I used was almost the same as those you cover in your article. Nice work! Do you mind if I use this as a handout next time I teach this class?
A good article but a bit concise for beginners who actually learn from scratch. Asking the proof for extended sine rule as a problem was a really good exercise. Kudos!! Looking forward to advanced topics :)
both of yall wrong give me a min.....to be sure.......double checked....both of yall is wrong .....!!!!
you have to sqaure it .....because of the geometrical.....in the 3rd and 4th ......circle and square...!!!! Anti
A1/2Cv2.....V...IS EQUAL TO NEGATIVE WHICH IS GROUND IN ENERGY.. MEANING a PLUS (CO) IS DIVIDED BY (IN) ONLY BECAUSE (S) WAS CANCELED .......I HAVE THIS IN MATH IN FORMULA TO TIME BEING MANIPULATED BY GRAVITY ......ANTI
I'll nitpick a bit, but you wrote, "Similarly, sinθ>0 for 0<θ<180∘ and 180∘<θ<360∘." You omitted "sinθ<0 for" after the word and. You also omitted the degree sign above the 0, i.e. it is 0∘<θ<180∘.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Nice job with this. But the area formula isn't A=21abcosC, it's A=21absinC.
Log in to reply
Oh crap, how could I make such a stupid typo!
Log in to reply
Ha ha yeah i saw it too.
GJ CJ !
I read through the whole thing [except for the 'solutions to the exercises' part]
Here's what I think.
1) It's concise, brief and to-the-point. This can be both good and bad. It would be unfair to assume that someone can learn trigonometry completely from scratch by reading your article. A person needs to have a little background on trigonometry before they can read your article.
2) The way you defined sines and cosines of angles in chapter 1 makes sines and cosines only non-negative. So exercise 1.1 should not ask the reader to prove that sinθ and cosθ are never less than −1.
3) In chapter 2, I'm not sure what you mean by radians are unitless. The radian itself is a unit. It is the unit of angular measure. And the radian does have a symbol, the superscript c [2πc]. But people do not use it as it may give rise to confusion.
4) I'm not totally sure how you do it in the USA, but here we learn complex numbers way after we learn basic trig. Using Euler's formula to derive trig identities is probably not the best way to teach people who are learning trig for the first time.
5) Other than that, I think it's quite well-written with enough diagrams and those are really important while learning trig.
I see that you have other articles on academia. I'm looking forward to reading them later today.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I didn't say that they weren't. But the radian is an SI-derived unit. It's dimensionless.
Here's Wikipedia to back me up.
Imgur
The main issue I had was the sentence "radians are unitless" since they are units that measure angles.
Log in to reply
s=rθ where s is arc length, r is radius, and θ is angle in radians. Therefore, θ is unitless.
Radians are unitless... we know thatOn your very same Wikipedia page,
Log in to reply
s=180πrθ where θ is in degrees. Therefore θ is unitless?
Neither θ is unitless. Both θ's have a dimensionless unit.
To say radians are unitless is the same as saying that meters are unitless. Both meters and radians measure a measurable physical quantity. Meters measure length, displacement; radians measure angles, angular displacement. And that's what units do, don't they? They measure stuff.
The only difference between the meter and the radian is one of them has dimensions while the other one doesn't.
It can also be argued that "pure numbers" have units. 1 is the unit for positive integers. ±1, ±i are the units for Gaussian integers.
I agree. It needs no unit symbol. But does not mean that it is not a unit. A degree is also the ratio of two lengths times a constant.
It all boils down to what you mean by a unit. To me, a unit is a standard amount of a physical quantity. A radian is specifically that. It just happens that the physical quantity it represents has no dimensions.
Log in to reply
It's ironic how I taught a few trigonometry and complex number classes to middle and high school students at MIT last week (taught it 3 times). These seminars were one 1 hour long, each. (Not a series, separate classes) and the topics I covered and the approach I used was almost the same as those you cover in your article. Nice work! Do you mind if I use this as a handout next time I teach this class?
Log in to reply
Sure!
Log in to reply
Thanks!
@Cody Johnson @Ahaan Rungta Can you add these notes to the Trigonometry section on the Wiki? Thanks!
Awesome article! I am new to trigonometry and it has helped me a lot. Thank you for taking the time to write this. :)
it is comprehensive for beginners
Great work Cody!
A good article but a bit concise for beginners who actually learn from scratch. Asking the proof for extended sine rule as a problem was a really good exercise. Kudos!! Looking forward to advanced topics :)
Log in to reply
both of yall wrong give me a min.....to be sure.......double checked....both of yall is wrong .....!!!! you have to sqaure it .....because of the geometrical.....in the 3rd and 4th ......circle and square...!!!! Anti
Log in to reply
A1/2Cv2.....V...IS EQUAL TO NEGATIVE WHICH IS GROUND IN ENERGY.. MEANING a PLUS (CO) IS DIVIDED BY (IN) ONLY BECAUSE (S) WAS CANCELED .......I HAVE THIS IN MATH IN FORMULA TO TIME BEING MANIPULATED BY GRAVITY ......ANTI
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I like the article but it can't teach you trigonometry in one day.
I'll nitpick a bit, but you wrote, "Similarly, sinθ>0 for 0<θ<180∘ and 180∘<θ<360∘." You omitted "sinθ<0 for" after the word and. You also omitted the degree sign above the 0, i.e. it is 0∘<θ<180∘.
Log in to reply
Haha, I fixed it.
Thank you all for your feedback. I will edit and update the article.
Log in to reply
Thanks Cody for the trig lesson.
Amazing well done and explanatory really helped thanks
On page 6, the area formula of triangle A can be confused with the angle A. You can use [△ABC] instead. Other than that is amazing. ^__^
Where is the article? I'd like tor read it, but I can't find it.
looks great - really appreciate this