Limit of Equality

Hey, I have stumbled upon something quite interesting. If \(\lim_{x\to n} \frac{f\left(x\right)}{g\left(x\right)} = 1\), that means that \(\lim_{x\to n} f\left(x\right) = \lim_{x\to n} g\left(x\right)\). This assumption may be wrong. But, for \(f\left(x\right) = \ln x\) and \(g\left(x\right) = \left(x^2+1\right)\ln x\), \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} f\left(x\right) = -\infty\) and \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} g\left(x\right) = 0\). But, even stranger is that \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{f\left(x\right)}{g\left(x\right)} = 1\).

WHAT IS GOING ON?!?!?!

Note by Jimmi Simpson
8 years, 4 months ago

No vote yet
3 votes

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

Log in to reply

Thats a good observation. Apart from using Wolfram, we know that exponential growth dominates any polynomial growth, which is why we have limx0+g(x)= \lim_{x \rightarrow 0^+} g(x) = - \infty .

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh, I see. I had checked by graphing only to realise that I had entered the wrong function.

Jimmi Simpson - 8 years, 4 months ago

I think that assumption is wrong because limxnf(x)g(x)=limxnf(x)limxng(x)\lim_{x\to n}\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=\frac{\lim_{x\to n}f(x)}{\lim_{x\to n}g(x)} only when limxng(x)0\lim_{x\to n}g(x) \neq 0

Alan Zhang - 8 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, always make sure you that the conditions of the theorem are satisfied before you apply it.

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

Okay, then flip it. Either way the limit is 1.

Jimmi Simpson - 8 years, 4 months ago

Log in to reply

@Jimmi Simpson @Cody Look up the actual conditions of the theorem. Flipping it doesn't help since neither f(x) f(x) nor g(x) g(x) satisfy the conditions.

Calvin Lin Staff - 8 years, 4 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...