Hey, I have stumbled upon something quite interesting. If \(\lim_{x\to n} \frac{f\left(x\right)}{g\left(x\right)} = 1\), that means that \(\lim_{x\to n} f\left(x\right) = \lim_{x\to n} g\left(x\right)\). This assumption may be wrong. But, for \(f\left(x\right) = \ln x\) and \(g\left(x\right) = \left(x^2+1\right)\ln x\), \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} f\left(x\right) = -\infty\) and \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} g\left(x\right) = 0\). But, even stranger is that \(\lim_{x\to 0^+} \frac{f\left(x\right)}{g\left(x\right)} = 1\).
WHAT IS GOING ON?!?!?!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Are you sure limx→0+g(x)=0?
Log in to reply
Thats a good observation. Apart from using Wolfram, we know that exponential growth dominates any polynomial growth, which is why we have limx→0+g(x)=−∞.
Log in to reply
Oh, I see. I had checked by graphing only to realise that I had entered the wrong function.
I think that assumption is wrong because limx→ng(x)f(x)=limx→ng(x)limx→nf(x) only when limx→ng(x)=0
Log in to reply
Yes, always make sure you that the conditions of the theorem are satisfied before you apply it.
Log in to reply
Okay, then flip it. Either way the limit is 1.
Log in to reply
f(x) nor g(x) satisfy the conditions.
@Cody Look up the actual conditions of the theorem. Flipping it doesn't help since neither