So I solved https://brilliant.org/problems/summationnested-radical/ by Phani Ramadevu and it got me thinking: is there a limit to ∑n=1∞mnnm as m approaches infinity?
First few terms (found using W|A):
∑n=1∞0nn0 is undefined,
∑n=1∞1nn1 diverges,
∑n=1∞2nn2=6,
∑n=1∞3nn3=833=4.125,
∑n=1∞4nn4=81380≈4.691,
∑n=1∞5nn5=5123535≈6.904, and so forth.
#Calculus
#Limits
#Summation
#Pleasehelp
#InfiniteSeries
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
If you're talking about the sequence f(m)=n=1∑∞mnnm, then it diverges because the number of initial terms that have dominating values increases. Try it out yourself. You can easily see why! A more challenging part (perhaps tedious) is to determine the exact values of each of these f(m).
Log in to reply
That seems reasonable. I still think its curious that the series starts undefined, then becomes infinitely big before shrinking to 4.125 and then going off to infinity again. Pretty cool stuff.
Speaking of: that would make a good problem, "find the minimum of f(m)=∑n=1∞mnnm. "
How would that be done analytically (w/o guess & check)?