I derived the following equality using a few methods that aren't all that complicated. I'm wondering if there is any way to show this is true other than the way I used to derive it.
\[\int _{ -1 }^{ 1 }{ \frac { 2{ x }^{ 3 }+2bx+a+1 }{ \sqrt { 2{ x }^{ 2 }+2\left[ a+b \right] x+{ \left[ a+1 \right] }^{ 2 }+{ \left[ b-1 \right] }^{ 2 } } } dx } =\int _{ 0 }^{ 2 }{ \frac { a+2-y }{ \sqrt { { y }^{ 2 }-2\left[ a+2 \right] y+{ \left[ a+2 \right] }^{ 2 }+{ b }^{ 2 } } } dy } \]
where and are real numbers.
Something about it makes me think there's a trick that will make them look the same.
If there isn't any other generally simple way to get this, then I might mess around with what I did to see what can come of it.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Show your proof :)
Log in to reply
I used a vector field based off of a gravitational field centered at zero:
F(x,y)=⟨x2+y2−x,x2+y2−y⟩
This field is conservative, so any closed path integral should result in zero. I decided to create an arbitrary path starting at (a,b) that follows a parabola to (a+2,b) then proceeds linearly back to (a,b). I set up the following parametric equations for these paths:
r1(t)=⟨t+a+1,t2+b−1⟩ for −1≤t≤1
r2(t)=⟨a+2−t,b⟩ for 0≤t≤2
The line integrals give us
∫r1F(x,y)dr+∫r2F(x,y)dr=0
∫r1F(x,y)ds=−∫r2F(x,y)dr
From here, if I have copied everything down correctly, it should give the claim above. I might elaborate on the last steps later.