Ever wondered what every average human thinks when looking at non-arithmetic M@H?
Now I challenge YOU to make the craziest possible math problem EVER!!!
Here are the rules:
No words: introductions, if-then's, assumptions, ... Exception: you may use words briefly for definitions, but make sure to MINIMIZE the usage - i.e. use math language instead where possible (# vs. number, etc.)
One part of the problem must be solvable by > 90% of the masses (such as 1+1=2)
Must be visually terrorizing
Must be mentally terrorizing
Post links below for your submissions of the craziest math problem. The contest will be judged by votes: majority rule. Downvotes allowed. I will post a congratulation note to the winner along with the link to the problem. Hopefully it will be powered by re-shares from the big boys (Calvin).
The contest begin today and ends August 1st.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
n is a positive non-zero integer. Solve for n. Clues for this one can be found in one of my notes.
You may use a computer.
Log in to reply
Woops I past my deadline, lol. Apparently the only downvote you got was from me ^.^ Well, could you please provide me with the LaTeX of the problem, or is that its best rendering over there?
Log in to reply
If you copy and paste the image, it can be enlarged nicely, with little loss of detail. But I suggest you first have a look at my messageboard to get a hint how to solve this.
Michael Mendrin's Messageboard
To actually try to compute this expression, even with a computer and math software, is a fairly formidable task.
Log in to reply
So, what do you think about my precious new VE about derivatives?
Log in to reply
3.
John, here's the thing. Your posed problem is actually a legitimate one, i.e., something that can be done by hand, if one is patient enough, and willing enough to understand the concept of irrational derivatives. Mine can only be understood if first deconstructed, i.e., go back to the source of other prime number formulas that make use of floor functions (there are now quite a few out there). Otherwise, as I said, it's a formula that even computers can find it difficult to compute. It's a very real thing, it's not made up fantasy. The formula I posted in my messageboard will indeed deliver P(n), or the nth prime number, for integer n. So, the correct answer to the problem I posted isGiven that it's not realistic for anyone to do my problem without first knowing its antecedents, I'd vote for yours.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Edit: Okay, see my first comments on this
VE
By the way, "VE" to someone like me means "Victory in Europe". I think one has to be really old to get this.
Meh. Looks lazy and repetitive. Lots of white space.
Not scary.
(Just my opinion ^.^)
Log in to reply
Yours doesn't have much white space in the same way graffiti art doesn't leave much room for white space. But what do I know about art? It's just an opinion. Hoo-hah.
Log in to reply
But... I can't promise my problem is harder if we remove the bottom-most fraction. Everything is simply simplification, that's all. Kk I'ma back away into my corner now...
Log in to reply
∣x∣<0
Log in to reply
Poon, algebras with negative norms is a thing. It's not true that ∣x∣<0 is a mathematical impossibility. Here's a paper discussing spinors and Clifford algebras, both of which play prominent roles in theoretical physics
The Construction of Spinors in Geometric Algebra
On pages 2 and 6, it speaks of vectors of negative norms. This is not an isolated instance. What makes this paper slightly different from most other papers on mathematical physics is that the construction of the relevant Clifford algebra for spinors uses the utility of vectors of negative norms. Most other physics papers that run into negative norms complain about how they keep cropping up like weeds, and they talk about how to get rid of them because they seem to suggest physical nonsense--like negative energy and negative distance. Kind of like how that black, sticky goo that sometimes came out of the ground back before the 19th century was considered to be an odious nuisance best to be gotten rid of. But, mathematically speaking, "negative norms" are not un-mathematical.
Log in to reply
Maaan... how many courses do I need to take to understand that lol
Though on the other hand I feel like I'm beyond this stuff and just feel intimidated by the notations or am just lazy ;p
Log in to reply
^.^
Too scary! OMG! Save me!
Log in to reply
O_o...
You're onto something.
It must look crazier than this!:
Here is my submission (without math-speak). GO BEAT IT!
Log in to reply
I cannot recommend this idea.
Words taken away from math is just Kaboobly doo, like life taken away from a person would just be a bag of chemicals. The essence of mathematics is in its beauty and simplicity, not to scare the damn out of people.
Personally, I've no idea what joy a sane mathematician would get out of solving your problem
Log in to reply
The point is not to make it "right," or even elegant. The point is to make the most crazy-looking problem you can, so that it intimidates the neurons out of those who look at it (besides the math pros).
I agree that what the world needs are sane mathematicians.
doodly-do badoodlydodololodoodo
I'm still waiting for a solution to this problem!
Log in to reply
I have all of it besides the bottom fraction. I lost the notebook on where I copied the solution down to... Meh...
But the moment I'm finding I'm flying straight over here!
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Pith Derivative
In fact, all but the bottom fraction are scattered throughout my profile. It's an easter egg hunt ^.^