The quantity \(\frac{\tan\frac{\pi}{5}+i}{\tan\frac{\pi}{5}-i}\) is the tenth root of unity. In other words, it is equal to \(\cos\frac{2n\pi}{10}+i \sin\frac{2n\pi}{10}\) for some integer \(n\) between 0 and 9 inclusive. Which value of n?
Does anyone know a way to proceed in this question?
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
It's obvious that one of the steps is to clear the denominator of any complex valued expression by multiplying numerator and denominator by its complex conjugate tan5π+i. This yields tan5π−itan5π+i=tan25π+1(tan5π+i)2=(sec5πtan5π+i)2=(sin5π+icos5π)2=sin52π+icos52π, where we used DeMoivre's formula in the last step.
EDIT:
There is something very wrong with the above solution. The correct answer should be n=3. Note that tan5π<tan4π=1, so that the argument of the numerator is more than π/4. So after multiplying by the complex conjugate, the square of the numerator must have an argument greater than π/2; i.e., it must have a negative real part. This is not the case with the answer n=2.
I suspect the flaw in my solution arises from not considering more carefully the use of the trigonometric identity tan2θ+1=sec2θ, but I have not figured out exactly what is going on yet. I will look into the matter further.
EDIT 2:
Oh for crying out loud... after I looked at my other solution I immediately realized the elementary mistake I made. De Moivre's formula is (cosθ+isinθ)n=cosnθ+isinnθ--I have the sines and cosines switched. Therefore, we should write (sin5π+icos5π)2=(cos103π+isin103π)2=e6iπ/10=e3iπ/5, and that's the correct result.
Log in to reply
If i were to do this a different way, I would proceed by multiplying numerator and denominator by cos5π: tan5π−itan5π+i=sin5π−icos5πsin5π+icos5π=e−iπ/5eiπ/5=e2iπ/5. This still gives the wrong answer, yet I am at a loss as to explain why.
Wow, I shouldn't be doing math so late at night...my apologies for being so silly. I should have written sin5π−icos5πsin5π+icos5π=cos103π−isin103πcos103π+isin103π=e6iπ/10=e3iπ/5, which gives the correct answer after all. Now I have to figure out what I did wrong in my original solution.
Your mistake lies in the expansion of the term (sin5π+icos5π)2
The correct expansion turns out to be:
sin25π−cos5π+isin52π
−(cos52π)+isin52π
Now note that: cos52π=−cos53π
And, sin52π=sin53π
Hence, our results occur. Correct me if I did anything wrong here.
Forgive me. I didn't notice that you have already edited your original solution and found your mistake.(Faulty Internet connection).
The problem with your first solution is you have sic, not cis. By simple confunctions, you can turn sin 2pi / 5 + i cos 2pi / 5 into cos 3pi / 5 + i sin 3pi / 5. Sorry for not using latex, I'm at work and only have a small time before I need to get back.
Take i common in both the numerator and denominator in, (tanπ/5+i)/(tanπ/5−i) to make it, (-itanπ/5+1)/(-itanπ/5−1) which again becomes, (-iSinπ/5+Cosπ/5)/(-iSinπ/5−Cosπ/5) or, (iSinπ/5-Cosπ/5)/(iSinπ/5+Cosπ/5) Using De moiver's theorum in this( In the numerator the argument is 4π/5) We get n=3.
Log in to reply
A useful way to deal with fractions of the form a−ba+b=dc is to use "componendo and dividendo" to conclude that ba=c−dc+d.
Apply it to this problem, what do you get?
Consider the argument of that complex number. It is equal to arg(tan(5π)+i)−arg(tan(5π)−i), which is
arctan(tan(5π)1)−arctan(tan(5π)−1)=2arctan(tan(5π)1)
To calculate this draw a triangle ABC such that the side CB=1,BA=tan(5π) angle ABC=2π and CAB=arctan(tan(5π)1). Note that CAB=2π−5π=103π, so its argument is 53π.
I hope this method helps.
Log in to reply
The correct answer is n=3. Now, i understand. Thank you for the neat explanation!
Your answer is actually correct; it is mine that is wrong.
No calculation has to be done!! It is clear that any value of n belongs to N should satisfy the equation!!!!