Mass of photon and Einstein's theory of relativity
m=1−c2v2m0
As speed of light changes in a medium, should we change the denominator also?
If we dont change the denominator, then for a photon travelling with a high fraction of speed of light in a medium (less than c), mass should be defined, but it is not.
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
@Prince Loomba
–
Mass of what? The rest mass of the photon is zero. And the above formula is consistent with the fact that the moving mass of a photon is not defined.
@A Former Brilliant Member
–
I am saying the first point is valid for all, for all particles it should be such. But the second point is for photon specially
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
The speed of the photon is same regardless of the medium.
It is it's apparent speed that we observe (which is lower due to collisions with the particles of the medium).
Note: This argument holds for any mass less particle as well.
Log in to reply
The 2nd is not. Obvio the first is
Log in to reply
As I am saying mass should be defined, which is not only in photon's case
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're saying.
Log in to reply