Consider an rectangular grid . Find the total number of paths one can reach from lower left corner to upper right corner .
Plz post ur method and other variations possible in such questions,
For example the number of shortest path possible from one corner to opposite corner is
I dont know how to solve if its asked number of paths possible to reach from one corner to the corner above it.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Assume person starts from lower left corner. To take the shortest path, one can travel only up or right in each step. And there are of course, m+n steps to take. In the end, the person is at the top right corner, this means that he/she has traveled m units up and n units right. The order in which these steps were arranged is the thing that matters here and is the thing we have to count. Basically you need the coefficient of xnym in (x+y)m+n.
Log in to reply
if total number of possible paths are asked then??
Log in to reply
Then the answer is infinite, as one can keep going in loops around the grid.
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
eg: if there are thirty vertical blocks and person can take three steps only, this is same as 10 vertical blocks when the person is taking one step each.
well this set helps a lot
Log in to reply
Yes, I saw that set.. My friend gave me similar qs.. so I din't go for solving them again.
Can you add your explanation to Rectangular Grid Paths wiki? Thanks!
it's infinite if you said all path. Obviously, because you told all possible paths, and you can return to a point you started, that makes number of possible paths infinite. What's wrong?
I think this problem would be more interesting if it asked for the number of ways to reach the opposite square, not being able to retrace your path, i.e. go on squares you have already been on.
Log in to reply
right. I guess that's what meant