Hi I recently came across a problem which peaked my interest. The problem was to approximate (or determine the value of):
without the use of a calculator. You are given a table of logs in base e of natural numbers. I am interested to see what various methods of approach there are.
Method 1
For me, the first approach was to define a function :
and then use Taylor's expansion about the point . Then we obtain:
and put , and which we can determine using the table. The degree of accuracy can be manipulated by changing the number of terms in the expansion we use, and how many decimal places of we use.
The only problem with this is the issue of approximating still remains.
Method 2
Another approach requires a little bit more work.
Suppose , then we want to approximate
Now:
Now for any real
Now by taking the first two terms of the binomial expansion, so:
Now without going into too much detail, we want to minimise to minimise the error term, so we chose
for some large positive integer (the higher the value of , the better the approximation)
Then:
So
Hence, depending on the accuracy of the approximation, we can chose a positive integer appropriately to approximate the original expression. Again, we must estimate the value of as it appears in our approximating expression.
Do comment on any other methods of approximating this value!
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Be careful with trying to apply the Taylor series to a large x value.
Do you know the radius of convergence? Do you know the rate of convergence? You might have to calculate many many terms in order to get an approximation.
Interesting question! If you don't want to approximate 3 you can use the identity ln(r+3)=21[ln(2r)+ln(2rr2+3+3)]
If you repeat this you can get an approximation to 5d.p. 21(ln4+21(ln27+ln(5697+3)))
Note it isn't a coincidence that 5697≈3 and so after simplification the expression becomes 84ln4+2ln7+ln3
If you repeat it once more, 168ln4+4ln7−4ln2+2ln97−2ln28+ln12≈1.31695789684
In comparison, ln(2+3)≈1.31695789692
Log in to reply
Thank you very much! I didn't come across this so this was very interesting