I saw this video going around of engineering students at their graduation from MIT who were unable to power a light bulb using a battery and a single wire:
It is surprising that the engineers would have trouble rigging up the circuit. Let's take a look at the problem and see what this episode can teach us about effective learning.
A conventional lightbulb has two terminals—one at the base and another at the threads of the bulb. If these two terminals are kept at differing voltages, current will flow across the bulb, causing the filament to glow.
The obvious way to close the circuit and light the bulb is to use two wires:
While the setup with one wire appears to be different, it is actually the same. We can see this by drawing a diagram.
Consider the conventional circuit with two wires
Let’s ask ourselves a simple question: what is a wire? The answer is: a tool to connect two components of an electrical circuit. This is all the insight we need to close the circuit with one wire.
Looking at the battery and the light bulb, it's clear that we can touch one of the terminals of the battery directly to the threads of the bulb.
For instance, by touching the positive terminal of the battery to the thread of the bulb, we put the threads at the same potential as the positive terminal. If we now use the wire to connect the terminal at the base of the bulb to the negative terminal of the battery, the circuit will close, with a sustained voltage across the terminals of the bulb that's equal to the voltage of the battery—let there be light!
Thus, we can eliminate one of the wires without incident.
You may have noticed this isn't the only way to close the circuit. In fact, there are three other arrangements that will work. While the bulb requires a voltage across its terminals, it doesn't care about the polarity.
So, we could also do the following:
The simple lesson is: if there's a way to make two circuit components touch without using a wire, we don't need to.
Those students probably all knew how lightbulbs, circuits, and batteries worked. However, they also probably spent the last several years of college in upper division classes that focused on abstraction and theory. When confronted with the basics, they no longer recognized where the lightbulb and the battery fit into their skill set and knowledge base. This is not a problem unique to MIT or elite academia. Losing track of the basics is an innate hazard of learning a lot very quickly.
Chief Happiness Officer Zorro consults with Pete.
In any field that you find yourself in, you can protect yourself from a future light bulb + battery moment by laying your foundational knowledge in the firm understanding of simple cases. If you have a sound understanding of the fundamentals in your discipline, you will always be able to derive more sophisticated ideas from the basics. Conversely, it's extremely hard to rediscover the fundamentals from merely remembering the wealth of fancy results of your field of study. In other words, when you get lost… go back to the basics.
Want more like this? Check out the Physics of the Everyday course.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Apparently, these Harvard grads haven't ever taken a flashlight apart. I mean, how many times have I had to take apart a flashlight because the battery wasn't making a good connection with the bottom of the bulb?
Then again, maybe they don't make flashlights like that any more. Maybe it's all done with Wi-Fi.
Log in to reply
I didn't think of this. The flashlight definitely raises the stakes.
Well you people should see India I guess then.Here from grade 8 onwards students know only 1 word...JEE.Just mug up huge books for 5 years just the sake of those 6 hours.By the time they reach IIT...they forget how to ride a bicycle.
It is vital that there be practical/vocational training for students. I am from Afghanistan and most 5 year old kids there would be able to achieve this because they have played around with batteries and bulbs. I remember a Big Bang Theory episode where Howard was asked if he knew about internal combustion engines and he said something along the lines of "Yeah, I am an Engineer" but couldn't fix one. I would think practical portion of the field is just as important as the theory when teaching!
Log in to reply
Ya I know at my school I learned that in 1st grade when I was 6
Unbelievable. Really.
isn't that ur dog sir :)
Log in to reply
This is possible.
This is gold. Imagine being able to do pages and pages of physics problems and practice tests to end up not knowing how to light up a bulb🤣
Log in to reply
I know right. These people probably haven't touched physical objects other than books and pens in years lol
Log in to reply
I seriously wonder... how can engineers learn to build things without actually being able to build things? Wtf?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
However, that being said, the hardest part is learning the mathematical aspect of the engineering. The practical aspect is much easier. But still; it's surprising that their conceptual understanding is so poor.
Log in to reply
@Krishna Karthik
Yes...See my new note on my profile, its about Murphy's LawLog in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
scary.
Engineering is about creating and most of the universities produce scientists and not engineers .Its an initiative u take upon yourself and do it
You can see the guys spent time in vain at the university, since they can't do such an elementary task..... It directly shows the status of the university and students' interest....
wtf it's spam https://writix.co.uk/buy-dissertation-help
Log in to reply
Lol
Yeah; the guy's clearly a bot: https://brilliant.org/profile/georgina-wyem6v/about/
Log in to reply
Are you talking about me ?
Log in to reply
You can clearly see that there are zero problems solved, and zero activity, except that comment below to promote writix. Well, the "guy above" wasn't a good choice of words. The comment got bumped down after I downvoted it.
Wow. Interesting !!
It's funny for some reason, but... I know perfectly well and I understand why it happens. The level of education is going down significantly right now. Lots of problems, though many of them are being solved. At least solvable with the help of the website https://writix.co.uk/buy-dissertation-help , which helps in writing materials on various topics.Used the website when I was in graduate school, when I could buy a dissertation. It was invaluable help then. And I'll say that it didn't affect my professional skills or my education.