We are all aware of the usual graphical method of solving a multi-variable system of inequalities. But how could one solve such a system algebraically? Also, does a system of inequalities follow the usual arithmetic of simultaneous equations? For instance, does the system
necessarily imply . ( It does not seem to, since and is a perfectly valid solution)
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
No, algebra of inequalities is not that simple... You cannot just simply subtract or divide two inequalities like we do to two equations. As its evident that you have subtracted inequalitities which isn't allowed and hence gave wrong results..... As an explicit example, if it had been:
x+y>3 and x+2y<5 Then multiply first equation by (−1) and add to second equation to get:
−(x+y)+x+2y<2⟺y<2
Note:- You can only add two inequalities together. You will not always be able to multiply, subtract or divide them.
PS:- I don't know any algebraic method to solve system these type of linear equations in two variables as I always relied on graph for getting solutions and they did the job fairly easily!
Log in to reply
Note: You cannot multiply two inequalities. For example, −2<1 and −2<1. Can we multiply them to conclude that 4<1?
What is true is that you can multiply and divide by terms with the same sign. IE You can multiply/divide by −(x+y)2, but not by −x+y.
Log in to reply
True that.....
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
So, your note should be
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin
@Rishabh Cool
@Nihar Mahajan
If I've understood what you mean I think you could divide this system in 3 disequalities (a>b>c --> a>b, b>c, a>c) but I don't know if it works. Anyway with the values x=100 and y=1 you obtain 101 > 302 > 5, that is not true.
Log in to reply
Sorry for the typo. I have edited the note