This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
for ease write the equation as(2x)2=40[x]−51 by definition the floor function is an integer, implying 40[x]-51 is also an integer which also implies (2x)2 is an integer
All the real roots of the given equation will lie in (1,9). This can be easily figured out once you draw the graphs: y=4x2+51 and y=40⌊x⌋ [because the points at which these two graphs will intersect will be the solutions of the given equation] and observe that the later one will never be able to catch the former one.
So now let us look at our equation, which can be rewritten as 4x2+51=40⌊x⌋. Looking at the RHS we conclude that it is always an integer. Therefore for the equation to be correct LHS must be an integer too.
Now put ⌊x⌋=i in the RHS, where i is an integer lying in (1,9) and find the value of x. To be more explicit, only those values of x will be considered as the roots of the given equation which will satisfy ⌊x⌋=i simultaneously.
@Harish Sasikumar
–
I used the Shreedhacharya rule. it gave me two roots, one is 3/2 as mentioned in your answer. the other was 17/2. I am an amateur at math and might have made some mistake. Joined brilliant.org recently to improve my problem solving skill.
@Silver Vice
–
OK. Understood the mistake. You took it as a quadratic equation and solved. That's how you got those solutions (3/2 and 17/2).
However it is NOT a quadratic equation. There is a 'floor' function in between which is represented as ⌊x⌋ and is defined as the the integral part of a real number. For example
⌊3.4⌋=3
Keep doing problems Brilliant. It's an awesome source of problems. Best of luck :).
obviously [x]≥2 as 2x=40[x]−51 and x real.
put x =[x]+y where y is frac part ≥0 and <1.so
4([x]+y)2−40[x]+51=4y2+8[x]y+(4[x]2−40[x]+51)=0
due to y range:(the other one will always <0 on the restrictions)
0≤2−2[x]+40[x]−51<10≤−2[x]+40[x]−51<22[x]≤40[x]−51<2+2[x]4[x]2≤40[x]−51<4[x]2+8[x]+44[x]2−40[x]+51≤0<4[x]2−32[x]+55
different cases we get(since all int≥2):
2≤[x]≤8∩[x]≤2(squeezes with [x]≥2 to get [x]=2)or[x]≥6
so {[x]=26≤[x]≤8
just check all 4 cases to get respective y and x.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
(2x)2−40⌊x⌋+51=0
Two things to be noticed here:
Therefore, the fractional part of x would be 0.5. Now we can write x=N+0.5 and solve it quite easily.
Edit: @Dev Sharma @Aareyan Manzoor @Adarsh Kumar @Akshat Sharda This solution is wrong. Because 2x need not be an integer. (2x)2∈Z⇒2x∈Z. I'll have to think again about an alternative method.
Log in to reply
One can easily draw the grpah of 10x2+4051 and ⌊x⌋ and find the intersection.
Ooops!I didn't see that !Thanx a lot!
why 2x must be integer?
Log in to reply
for ease write the equation as(2x)2=40[x]−51 by definition the floor function is an integer, implying 40[x]-51 is also an integer which also implies (2x)2 is an integer
Log in to reply
A simple standard approach will crush it:
All the real roots of the given equation will lie in (1,9). This can be easily figured out once you draw the graphs: y=4x2+51 and y=40⌊x⌋ [because the points at which these two graphs will intersect will be the solutions of the given equation] and observe that the later one will never be able to catch the former one.
So now let us look at our equation, which can be rewritten as 4x2+51=40⌊x⌋. Looking at the RHS we conclude that it is always an integer. Therefore for the equation to be correct LHS must be an integer too.
Now put ⌊x⌋=i in the RHS, where i is an integer lying in (1,9) and find the value of x. To be more explicit, only those values of x will be considered as the roots of the given equation which will satisfy ⌊x⌋=i simultaneously.
Actually, the solution is simpler than you might think.
Rearranging the equation: 40⌊x⌋=4x2+51
40(x−1)<4x2+51≤40x
From the lower limit, 4x2+51>40(x−1) (x−27)(x−213)>0
(x<27 and x<213) OR (x>27 and x>213 ) which imply x<27 OR x>213
Similarly, from upper limit, 4x2+51≤40x (x−217)(x−23)≤0
(x≥217 and x≤23) OR (x≤217 and x≥23 ) which imply (an impossible case) OR 23≤x≤217
Hence, solutions are in the region (1.5≤x<3.5)U(6.5<x≤8.5)
Rearranging the given equation, we get x=240⌊x⌋−51
Solving in each region,
@1.5≤x<2,⌊x⌋=1 x has no real solutions
@2≤x<3,⌊x⌋=2 x=229
@3≤x<3.5,⌊x⌋=3 x=269 Which is a contradiction (as it is not in the region)
(Note: I may even have done some stupid mistake, please verify)
@6.5<x<7,⌊x⌋=6 x=2321
@7≤x<8,⌊x⌋=7 x=2229
@8≤x<8.5,⌊x⌋=8 x=2269
[Please comment, if you find any of the assumptions to be wrong or questionable. ]
Log in to reply
8.20060973342836
Log in to reply
Yes, you are correct. I changed it.
Log in to reply
Can someone explain, why there are 2 'rejectable' solutions coming up as we are solving it ?
I found 17/2 to be an answer too.
Log in to reply
How did you get that solution? It doesn't seem correct. 17/2=8.5
LHS=4(8.5)2−40⌊8.5⌋+51=289−320+51=20=0 It doesn't satisfy the equation
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
However it is NOT a quadratic equation. There is a 'floor' function in between which is represented as ⌊x⌋ and is defined as the the integral part of a real number. For example ⌊3.4⌋=3
Keep doing problems Brilliant. It's an awesome source of problems. Best of luck :).
Log in to reply
How about 4 y - 40 ⌊y⌋ + 51 = 0 for all rational y?
y = {7.25, 47.25, 57.25, 67.25}
z - 40 ⌊4z⌋ + 51 = 0 for all positive integer z!
z = {29, 189, 229, 269}
I guess this is the solution of the equation 4 x2 - 40 ⌊x⌋ + 51 = 0.
x = {429,4189,4229,4269} = {229,2321,2229,2269}
This means it doesn't follow only 2 but duplicated into 4. Changed from {217,23}.
z - 40 ⌊−4z⌋ + 51 = 0 for all positive integer z could be some more but not found with any.
x = {229,2321,2229,2269}
obviously [x]≥2 as 2x=40[x]−51 and x real. put x =[x]+y where y is frac part ≥0 and <1.so 4([x]+y)2−40[x]+51=4y2+8[x]y+(4[x]2−40[x]+51)=0 due to y range:(the other one will always <0 on the restrictions) 0≤2−2[x]+40[x]−51<1 0≤−2[x]+40[x]−51<2 2[x]≤40[x]−51<2+2[x] 4[x]2≤40[x]−51<4[x]2+8[x]+4 4[x]2−40[x]+51≤0<4[x]2−32[x]+55 different cases we get(since all int≥2): 2≤[x]≤8∩[x]≤2(squeezes with [x]≥2 to get [x]=2)or[x]≥6 so {[x]=26≤[x]≤8 just check all 4 cases to get respective y and x.