Need help for the proofs about number theory.

Note: pnp_{n} is the n-th prime number (p1=2,p2=3,p3=5p_{1} = 2, p_{2} = 3, p_{3} = 5, etc).

1.) Prove that pn+1<i=1npip_{n+1} < \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} p_{i} for any integer n>2n > 2.

2.) Prove that i=1npi<i=1npi\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} p_{i} < \prod\limits_{i=1}^{n} p_{i} for any integer n>1n > 1.

3.) Prove or counterexample that n!N\sqrt{n!} \notin \mathbb{N} for any integer n>1n > 1.

#NumberTheory #Bertrand'sPostulate #PrimeNumbers

Note by Samuraiwarm Tsunayoshi
7 years, 3 months ago

No vote yet
1 vote

  Easy Math Editor

This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.

When posting on Brilliant:

  • Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
  • Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
  • Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
  • Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.

MarkdownAppears as
*italics* or _italics_ italics
**bold** or __bold__ bold

- bulleted
- list

  • bulleted
  • list

1. numbered
2. list

  1. numbered
  2. list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
paragraph 1

paragraph 2

paragraph 1

paragraph 2

[example link](https://brilliant.org)example link
> This is a quote
This is a quote
    # I indented these lines
    # 4 spaces, and now they show
    # up as a code block.

    print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.

print "hello world"
MathAppears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3 2×3 2 \times 3
2^{34} 234 2^{34}
a_{i-1} ai1 a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3} 23 \frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2} 2 \sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3 i=13 \sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta sinθ \sin \theta
\boxed{123} 123 \boxed{123}

Comments

I just proved number 3 in 3 seconds lol. Just Bertrand's Postulate that there exists a prime number from n2\frac{n}{2} to nn if nn is even or from n12\frac{n-1}{2} to n1n-1 if nn is odd.

For even number nn, if p>n2p > \frac{n}{2}, then 2p>n2p > n. Which means the next number that has a factor pp doesn't exist in n,n1,n2,...,3,2,1n,n-1,n-2,...,3,2,1 any more. So n!n! only have 1 factor of pp and makes it not perfect square.

For odd number nn, if p>n12p > \frac{n-1}{2}, then 2p>n12p > n-1. Same as above, there exists only 1 factor pp.

How about nn? Can nn have a factor of pp? No. If 2p=n2p = n, then nn is an odd number, which contradicts the given. So 2p>n2p > n or 2p<n2p < n.

For 2p>n2p > n, we're done. 2p2p doesn't exist in n,n1,n2,...,3,2,1n,n-1,n-2,...,3,2,1 any more.

For 2p<n2p < n, since 2p>n12p > n-1, therefore 2p2p can't be integers, which contradicts the truth.

Therefore, n!\sqrt{n!} can't be integers for any n>1n > 1.

Samuraiwarm Tsunayoshi - 7 years, 3 months ago

I agree with your q3 solution, it is very common in questions like these to use Bertrand's Postulate. In a moment I will post a very nice problem indeed. q2 is very susceptible to induction (just simple induction, maybe with a contradiction element if you want to simplify things). q1 is a very nice problem, as it combines techniques used in both q2 and q3 (use induction, with a contradiction, then use Bertrand's Postulate), so I thank you for these series of problems. If you want to know the problem I previously mentioned, just visit my page.

TheKnee OfJustice - 7 years, 3 months ago

You can have a one-liner inductive proof of Problem 1) using Bertrand's postulate, which is a well known proven result in number theory.

The base case for n=3n=3 is easy. Assume the assertion to hold good for an integer n3n\geq 3. Using this postulate, we have pn+1<pn+2<2pn+1=pn+1+pn+1<i=1n+1pip_{n+1} < p_{n+2} < 2 p_{n+1}= p_{n+1}+ p_{n+1} < \sum_{i=1}^{n+1}p_i, where the last inequality follows from the induction assumption.

Abhishek Sinha - 7 years, 3 months ago

Bertrand's Postulate

Rajeh Alghamdi - 7 years, 3 months ago
×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...