This is probably the hardest problem from that year. I cannot solve it. It would be great if anyone could help me with key ideas/full solution here. Even better if someone could post it at the source page where many are looking for a solution. Thanks in advance.
*Statement: *
Find where
Problem source - BdMO forum - Problem 11
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
We have S=m,n≥1∑3m+n(3mn+3nm)3nm2n and exchanging variables S=m,n≥1∑3n+m(3nm+3mn)3mn2m Summing both we have 2S=m,n≥1∑3n+m(3nm+3mn)3mn2m+3nm2n=m,n≥1∑3n+m(3nm+3mn)mn(3mn+3nm) and thus, factoring, 2S=m,n≥1∑3n+mmn=(n≥1∑3nn)(m≥1∑3mm) which is a standard problem.
One way to solve that part is using 23=n≥0∑3n1. Squaring and collecting terms with same denominator, 49=n≥0∑3nn+1=3n≥1∑3nn.
So we have 2S=(n≥1∑3nn)(m≥1∑3mm)=(43)2=169. Thus, S=329.
(And I can do all that algebraic juggling without worring about convergence because all the terms are nonnegative, so any ordering would be always convergent to the same number or divergent)
Log in to reply
Corollary: ∑n=1∞ann for a>1 is equal to (a−1)2a
Notice that this sum is equal to an infinite series of infinite series. Namely,
S1=a1+a21+…
S2=a21+a31+…
...
Which comes out to 1−a1a1+1−a1a21+…
Which is yet another infinite series, equal to 1−a1a−11=(a−1)2a.
Log in to reply
Thanks for the corollary. It will help many people I believe. :) I find just 1 thing confusing here.
Is Sn=ann? If yes, why is S2=a(a−1)1?
Log in to reply
The first series is a1+a22+a33+⋯.
How do we go about finding its sum? Notice that the first term of this series [a1] is the first term of S1. The second term of this series [a22] is the sum of the second term of S1 and the first term of S2. The third term of this series [a33] is the sum of the third term of S1, the second term of S2 and the first term of S3. The fourth term of this series [a44] is the sum of ... and onward.
So, if we want to find the sum of the original series, we have to find the sums of all the Si's. And it turns out that all the Si's are infinite series themselves. I think you can take it from here.
I hope this is helpful.
Log in to reply
Incidentally, one can also consider the series 1−x1=∑n≥0xn (convergent in (-1,1)) and differentiate it by x, so we have (1−x)21=∑n≥0nxn−1 so (1−x)2x=∑n≥0nxn. It is still convergent at (−1,1) so we ca evaluate it in x=31 and compute ∑n≥13nn=(1−1/3)21/3=43.
Repeating this process of differentiating and multiplying by x we can compute any value of the kind ∑n≥0nkxn for a fixed integer k. And summing those sums we can compute ∑n≥0P(n)xn for any polynomial P and it all will be convergent in (−1,1). (Or for any complex x inside the unit circle (∣x∣<1) but not necesarily at the border of the circle)
Is interchanging variables a common way to deal with such summations?
Log in to reply
Hum, so so. The train of thought, at least for me, went like this "Oh, that is ugly. I don't like things that are not symetric. Can I factor it? No? Well, I can write as 1/(x^2+xy) each summand some x and y. What if I sum it to itself, reversed? That would make things symmetric. Oh, the summand is now 1/(xy) so it is solvable now."
Or "Basically that sum is ugly and not very symmeyric. If I sum it to itself, reversed, it will be symmetric. So I will do that."
Well, interchanging variables might seem a little more intuitive if you rewrite the summand as S=m=1∑∞n=1∑∞m3m(m3m+n3n)1 and the rest of it would be quite similar to this one :)
You always want to "homogenize" the expression somehow because that often simplifies things.
Hint: If the summation was separable in each variable, it would be much much easier.
Hint: Interchange the order of summation.
Thanks a lot for the help. :)