This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
Good observation. The answer can be generalised for odd multiples of π. However, my intent was to only show that the result of raising a negative number to an irrational exponent is complex. Generalisation was not the intent of the comment.
The uniqueness of the resulting complex number is something to ponder on. Is there a better way of approaching such a computation?
@Karan Chatrath
–
If you were to generalize it, how about e^ki(pi)=.... for k is an odd integer. Forgive me, I do not know how to use the math symbols on this yet.
@Karan Chatrath
–
Oh. I just meany that because this is the one without any constants, so it should be the principal one, like the principal cube root of unity is 1.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let (−1)2=A
Then on taking the natural logarithm on both sides:
2ln(−1)=ln(A) Which implies:
2ln(i2)=2ln(eiπ)=2iπ=ln(A)
Or, A=eiπ2=cos(π2)+isin(π2)
So, the result is a complex number.
Note: i=−1 eiθ=cos(θ)+isin(θ)
Log in to reply
Not quite right. i2 can be equal to e3iπ as well. So the answer could also be cos(3π2)+isin(3π2).
Log in to reply
Good observation. The answer can be generalised for odd multiples of π. However, my intent was to only show that the result of raising a negative number to an irrational exponent is complex. Generalisation was not the intent of the comment.
The uniqueness of the resulting complex number is something to ponder on. Is there a better way of approaching such a computation?
Log in to reply
Log in to reply
SearchOnMath.
TryLog in to reply
Log in to reply