\[\large \displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0^{+}} \sin\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) = \ \text{Not defined}\]
limx→0xsin(1x)=0\large \displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} x\sin\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) = 0x→0limxsin(x1)=0
Then how could [not defined×0=0][\text{not defined} \times 0 = 0][not defined×0=0] ?
Note by Akhil Bansal 5 years, 8 months ago
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
_italics_
**bold**
__bold__
- bulleted- list
1. numbered2. list
paragraph 1paragraph 2
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
This is a quote
# I indented these lines # 4 spaces, and now they show # up as a code block. print "hello world"
\(
\)
\[
\]
2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
While the first limit is not defined, it is nevertheless bounded, as it oscillates between −1-1−1 and 1.1.1. Thus
−x≤xsin(1x)≤x,-x \le x\sin\left(\dfrac{1}{x}\right) \le x,−x≤xsin(x1)≤x,
and so by the Sandwich rule the second limit goes to 000 as x→0,x \rightarrow 0,x→0, (from both the left and the right).
Log in to reply
But if we combine both the steps,then they are not following the rules of maths.
We're not really "combining" the steps; we are looking at two different problems. The first limit is undefined since the bounded oscillation of sin(1x)\sin(\frac{1}{x})sin(x1) never ceases or diminishes as x→0.x \rightarrow 0.x→0. However, in the second limit this oscillation, since it is bounded and multiplied by xxx, diminishes to 000 as x→0,x \rightarrow 0,x→0, i.e., the diminution of xxx "beats out" the (bounded) oscillation of sin(1x),\sin(\frac{1}{x}),sin(x1), and so the product, and hence the limit, goes to 0.0.0.
Some instances of "undefined times 000" will be undefined, but in this case, because of the bounded nature of the "undefined" element, we do in fact find that the limit is defined.
@Brian Charlesworth – Thanks! I understood now
Shouldn't be surprising. Same holds when you remove the sin\sinsin function, IE
limx→01x= undefined ,limx→0x×1x=1 is defined \lim_{x \rightarrow 0 } \frac{1}{x} = \text{ undefined }, \lim_{ x \rightarrow 0 } x \times \frac{1}{x} = 1 \text{ is defined } x→0limx1= undefined ,x→0limx×x1=1 is defined
Thanks! I got it now.
@Brian Charlesworth , @Calvin Lin , @Prasun Biswas , @Sandeep Bhardwaj ...help please...
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
While the first limit is not defined, it is nevertheless bounded, as it oscillates between −1 and 1. Thus
−x≤xsin(x1)≤x,
and so by the Sandwich rule the second limit goes to 0 as x→0, (from both the left and the right).
Log in to reply
But if we combine both the steps,then they are not following the rules of maths.
Log in to reply
We're not really "combining" the steps; we are looking at two different problems. The first limit is undefined since the bounded oscillation of sin(x1) never ceases or diminishes as x→0. However, in the second limit this oscillation, since it is bounded and multiplied by x, diminishes to 0 as x→0, i.e., the diminution of x "beats out" the (bounded) oscillation of sin(x1), and so the product, and hence the limit, goes to 0.
Some instances of "undefined times 0" will be undefined, but in this case, because of the bounded nature of the "undefined" element, we do in fact find that the limit is defined.
Log in to reply
Shouldn't be surprising. Same holds when you remove the sin function, IE
x→0limx1= undefined ,x→0limx×x1=1 is defined
Log in to reply
Thanks! I got it now.
@Brian Charlesworth , @Calvin Lin , @Prasun Biswas , @Sandeep Bhardwaj ...help please...