This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Let n=degP and P(x)=i=0∑naixi.
First, note that if the inequality holds for x=1, then we have
P(1)≥P(1)1⟶P(1)2=(i=0∑nai)2≥1(∗)
We recall the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, which states that (i=0∑nαi2)(i=0∑nβi2)≥(i=0∑nαiβi)2. If we let αi=aixi and βi=ai/xi, then we have
(i=0∑naixi)(i=0∑nxiai)≥(i=0∑nai)2
Now, we observe that i=0∑naixi=P(x) and i=0∑nxiai=P(x1). Using (∗), we have
P(x)P(x1)≥(i=0∑nai)2≥1
Hence, we divide both ends by P(x) to obtain our desired equality:
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let n=degP and P(x)=i=0∑naixi.
First, note that if the inequality holds for x=1, then we have
P(1)≥P(1)1⟶P(1)2=(i=0∑nai)2≥1(∗)
We recall the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, which states that (i=0∑nαi2)(i=0∑nβi2)≥(i=0∑nαiβi)2. If we let αi=aixi and βi=ai/xi, then we have
(i=0∑naixi)(i=0∑nxiai)≥(i=0∑nai)2
Now, we observe that i=0∑naixi=P(x) and i=0∑nxiai=P(x1). Using (∗), we have
P(x)P(x1)≥(i=0∑nai)2≥1
Hence, we divide both ends by P(x) to obtain our desired equality:
P(x1)≥P(x)1
Log in to reply
Very nice solution. Cauchy-Schwarz was the best method (in my opinion). +1
Log in to reply
Why thank you! I'm not entirely adept at utilising Cauchy-Schwarz to its fullest extent but I'm quite happy with the results.
Is this problem an original one? If so, well-posed!
Log in to reply
Great Solution!
Ingenious use of the C-S inequality!
Nice Solution! I like the way you used Cauchy-Schwarz inequality to prove this.