This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
For those who don't know, here's a bit of a clarification. Fermat's little theorem states that for any positive number a and prime p, ap≡amodp. Using this, 2105≡2⋅(213)8≡2⋅28≡29(mod13)
Another approach is to observe that 13=22+32. Hence, this tells us that 2105+3105=(22+32)(2103)−210332+3105. Continue to factor out 13 in this way, and you can show that
2105+3105=(22+32)×Q+2×3104+3105=13Q+5×3104
Hence, this number is not divisible by 13.
In the language of modular arithmetic, we can say that since −22≡32(mod13), hence 2104≡3104(mod13). As such, 2105+3105≡21×3104+3105≡5×3104(mod13), which is not divisible by 13.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Let the remainder when 13 divides 2105 be c and when it divides 3105 be d.
We can write it as:
2105≡c(mod13) and 3105≡d(mod13)
Since 13 is prime, by Fermat's little theorem we can re-write the congruence's as:
1∗(29)≡c(mod13) and 1∗(39)≡d(mod13)
2∗(162)≡c(mod13) and 3∗(812)≡d(mod13)
2∗(32)≡c(mod13) and 3∗(32)≡d(mod13)
Hence, 2105≡5(mod13) and 3105≡1(mod13)
Therefore,
2105+3105≡6(mod13)
That is the given expression is not divisible by 13, since it leaves behind a remainder of 6.
Hence proved.
Log in to reply
For those who don't know, here's a bit of a clarification. Fermat's little theorem states that for any positive number a and prime p, ap≡amodp. Using this, 2105≡2⋅(213)8≡2⋅28≡29(mod13)
your proving is wrong... XD ... it needs a BOX..
Another approach is to observe that 13=22+32. Hence, this tells us that 2105+3105=(22+32)(2103)−210332+3105. Continue to factor out 13 in this way, and you can show that
2105+3105=(22+32)×Q+2×3104+3105=13Q+5×3104
Hence, this number is not divisible by 13.
In the language of modular arithmetic, we can say that since −22≡32(mod13), hence 2104≡3104(mod13). As such, 2105+3105≡21×3104+3105≡5×3104(mod13), which is not divisible by 13.
Log in to reply
There's a formatting error in your second equation.
Log in to reply
ya
22n+1+32n+1=2⋅4n+3⋅9n=2⋅4n+3(13−4)n≡4n(2+3(−1)n)(mod13)≡0 for any positive integer n
whereas 22n+32n=4n+9n=4n+(13−4)n≡4n(1+(−1)n)(mod13) which will be divisible by 13 iff n(>0) is odd
As 24≡3(mod13),2n+3n≡2n+24n(mod13)≡2n(8n+1)
So, 2n+3n will be divisible by 13 iff 8n≡−1(mod13)
Now, as 82=64≡−1(mod13)⟹82(2m+1)≡−1 for any non-negative integer m
So, n must be of the form 2(2m+1) where m is any non-negative integer
Now, 105 is not of the form 2(2m+1)