This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science
related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should
explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments
should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
Use the emojis to react to an explanation, whether you're congratulating a job well done , or just really confused .
Ask specific questions about the challenge or the steps in somebody's explanation. Well-posed questions can add a lot to the discussion, but posting "I don't understand!" doesn't help anyone.
Try to contribute something new to the discussion, whether it is an extension, generalization or other idea related to the challenge.
Stay on topic — we're all here to learn more about math and science, not to hear about your favorite get-rich-quick scheme or current world events.
Markdown
Appears as
*italics* or _italics_
italics
**bold** or __bold__
bold
- bulleted - list
bulleted
list
1. numbered 2. list
numbered
list
Note: you must add a full line of space before and after lists for them to show up correctly
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
# I indented these lines
# 4 spaces, and now they show
# up as a code block.
print "hello world"
Math
Appears as
Remember to wrap math in \( ... \) or \[ ... \] to ensure proper formatting.
2 \times 3
2×3
2^{34}
234
a_{i-1}
ai−1
\frac{2}{3}
32
\sqrt{2}
2
\sum_{i=1}^3
∑i=13
\sin \theta
sinθ
\boxed{123}
123
Comments
Only one pair of primes exist. I used casework to solve this.
We have
p3−q7=p−q
p3−p=q7−q
p(p−1)(p+1)=q(q3−1)(q3+1)
p(p−1)(p+1)=q(q−1)(q+1)(q2+q+1)(q2−q+1)…(1)
I will first check all cases when p3<q7, that is, when p3−q7 is negative. Note that since p and q are primes, one of q, q−1, q+1, q2+q+1 or q2−q+1 is equal to p assuming q=2 (This issue will be addressed).
Since the difference is negative, we must have p<q. Combining this with what we know, we have p=q−1. (Note: p=q2−q+1 since the quadratic is greater than q for all positive q.) Since p and q are primes, we have p=2, q=3. Checking, we find that this is incorrect so there are no solutions in this case.
Now, we check when p=q. We get that p−1=q−1 and p+1=q+1, rendering q2+q+1=1 and q2−q+1=1, which gives p=q=0 which are not primes. There are no solutions in this case.
Finally, we check when p>q. We have the following values for p: p=q+1, p=q2−q+1, p=q2+q+1. We will now look at each expresion for p.
Case 1:p=q+1
We get that p=3, q=2. Checking, we find that this is incorrect. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.
Case 2:p=q2−q+1
We have p=q2−q+1 so p−1=q2−q=q(q−1) which leaves p+1=(q+1)(q2+q+1) from (1). We now have
q2−q+1+1=(q+1)(q2+q+1)
q2−q+2=q3+2q2+2q+1
q3+q2+3q−1=0
Playing with this cubic, we find that it has no integral solutions for q (There are many different ways to check). Hence, there are no solutions in this case.
Case 3:p=q2+q+1
In this case, we have p=q2+q+1, so p−1=q2+q=q(q+1), which leaves p+1=(q−1)(q2−q+1) from (1). We now have the following:
q2+q+1+1=(q−1)(q2−q+1)
q2+q+2=q3−2q2+2q−1
q3−3q2+q−3=0
(q2+3)(q−3)=0
Clearly, only q=3 is the integral solution in this case, which implies p=13. Checking, we find that this is true. Therefore, only one solution exists in this case: p=13, q=3.
Thus, the only solution which satisfies is p=13, q=3.
@Պոոռնապռագնյա Պռ
–
Since p and q are primes, they both have 2 factors each: 1 and the number itself. This implies that p is equivalent to one of the expressions in the brackets.
Easy Math Editor
This discussion board is a place to discuss our Daily Challenges and the math and science related to those challenges. Explanations are more than just a solution — they should explain the steps and thinking strategies that you used to obtain the solution. Comments should further the discussion of math and science.
When posting on Brilliant:
*italics*
or_italics_
**bold**
or__bold__
paragraph 1
paragraph 2
[example link](https://brilliant.org)
> This is a quote
\(
...\)
or\[
...\]
to ensure proper formatting.2 \times 3
2^{34}
a_{i-1}
\frac{2}{3}
\sqrt{2}
\sum_{i=1}^3
\sin \theta
\boxed{123}
Comments
Only one pair of primes exist. I used casework to solve this.
We have
p3−q7=p−q
p3−p=q7−q
p(p−1)(p+1)=q(q3−1)(q3+1)
p(p−1)(p+1)=q(q−1)(q+1)(q2+q+1)(q2−q+1)…(1)
I will first check all cases when p3<q7, that is, when p3−q7 is negative. Note that since p and q are primes, one of q, q−1, q+1, q2+q+1 or q2−q+1 is equal to p assuming q=2 (This issue will be addressed).
Since the difference is negative, we must have p<q. Combining this with what we know, we have p=q−1. (Note: p=q2−q+1 since the quadratic is greater than q for all positive q.) Since p and q are primes, we have p=2, q=3. Checking, we find that this is incorrect so there are no solutions in this case.
Now, we check when p=q. We get that p−1=q−1 and p+1=q+1, rendering q2+q+1=1 and q2−q+1=1, which gives p=q=0 which are not primes. There are no solutions in this case.
Finally, we check when p>q. We have the following values for p: p=q+1, p=q2−q+1, p=q2+q+1. We will now look at each expresion for p.
Case 1: p=q+1
We get that p=3, q=2. Checking, we find that this is incorrect. Therefore, there are no solutions in this case.
Case 2: p=q2−q+1
We have p=q2−q+1 so p−1=q2−q=q(q−1) which leaves p+1=(q+1)(q2+q+1) from (1). We now have
q2−q+1+1=(q+1)(q2+q+1)
q2−q+2=q3+2q2+2q+1
q3+q2+3q−1=0
Playing with this cubic, we find that it has no integral solutions for q (There are many different ways to check). Hence, there are no solutions in this case.
Case 3: p=q2+q+1
In this case, we have p=q2+q+1, so p−1=q2+q=q(q+1), which leaves p+1=(q−1)(q2−q+1) from (1). We now have the following:
q2+q+1+1=(q−1)(q2−q+1)
q2+q+2=q3−2q2+2q−1
q3−3q2+q−3=0
(q2+3)(q−3)=0
Clearly, only q=3 is the integral solution in this case, which implies p=13. Checking, we find that this is true. Therefore, only one solution exists in this case: p=13, q=3.
Thus, the only solution which satisfies is p=13, q=3.
Great problem, Surya.
Log in to reply
This is a great problem and solution!
Log in to reply
Same solution.
@Surya Prakash , is this a satisfactory solution?
Log in to reply
Respected Sharky, I did not understand the second sentence below equation 1 ( Note that since p & q are primes, ...) I request you to explain.
Log in to reply
p and q are primes, they both have 2 factors each: 1 and the number itself. This implies that p is equivalent to one of the expressions in the brackets.
SinceNo such pair of primes exist.
Log in to reply
No. There exists.
Check out p=13 and q=3.